Didier, would you mind posting a GitLab issue for this? It's feasible,
but I'm so overloaded right now that there's no chance I will get to it
before I forget.
Thanks
On 19 Mar 2021, at 8:34, Didier Verna wrote:
François-René ÐVB Rideau écrivait:
Before it can be ignored, it must be defined. And so as to define it,
its class must be defined. I suppose we could have some error class
that it used when the class it not defined, that would only trigger
an
error at runtime if the feature is true. I'm sure the current / next
sucker^W maintainer will accept patches.
Not a big deal. I just thought that since everything in that form
are
keywords (so no read-time problem, as opposed to parsing
sb-grovel:grovel-constants-file), perhaps the intended behavior was
different.
So in the end, it seems that there's very little (if at all) to be
gained by using :if-feature to conditionalize on implementation
type.
--
¡En Seguida! -- New album:
https://www.didierverna.com/records/en-seguida.php
Available on all digital platforms now!
Lisp, Jazz, Aïkido: http://www.didierverna.info
