Is www.wuppertal-navigator.de is in any way related to webcache.urz.uni-wuppertal.de?
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 09:29:52PM -0800, mozdesigners wrote: > AW: AW: [aseek-users] several questions to indexOk you win! > > I will Install Linux on my machine and compile aspseek. > > I guess uncle Bill lost one more client. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:54 AM > Subject: AW: AW: [aseek-users] several questions to index > > > i have to agree with kir. > we have used htdig in the past on www.wuppertal-navigator.de > in the beginning it was quite good, but now as we index over 3000 different websites >with over 150.000 pages htdig was > > 1) far to slow, indexing needed more than two days, databases got very huge > 2) search on the index was - compared to aspseek - very slow > 3) as kir told, relevance was not as good as aspseek. > > what i really like on aspseek is the grouping function. as i said we are indexing >3000 different websites. when we used htdig > > it could happen that the first pages (!), means the first 10, 20 or 30 matches came >from the same site, eg. when the webmaster > > had used meta-tags or so... > so in this case the results were neary useless... many useres have complained about >it (ok they sometimes they have mixed > > the search on "Wuppertaler Internetseiten" (pages from/about wuppertal) and search >on our "Branchenbuch" (yellow pages)). > > with aspseek you can group the results, so - in the example - you only get two >entries in the result page even if the site > > matches much more pages... > > there is one thing i miss with aspseek: the fact that with htdig you could restrict >your searches to subfolders. in aspseek > > you have to setup "subsets" for this. you can't just restrict to any given >subdir.... maybe i sometime find the time to patch > > the sources..... > > mfg > > Markus Rietzler > * <rietzler_software/> | http://www.rietzler-software.de > * Wuppertal-Navigator | http://www.wuppertal-navigator.de > * eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Neue Nordstrasse 43 > 42105 Wuppertal > > Fon: 0700.RIETZLER (0700.7438 9537) > 0202.420830 > Fax: 0202.242 24 66 > > > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Kir Kolyshkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2002 12:22 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: Re: AW: [aseek-users] several questions to index > > mozdesigners wrote: > > > > Ok > > > > Almost everything you said is true! :) > > But htdig has a good spider. > > Please tell us more about it... > > > But let's talk about compiling Aspseek. > > Just use Linux. > > > I have another question. Is it possible to run an emulator or > > something else to compile this tool. > > > > When I use cygwin it returns this error: > > > > checking for Cygwin environment... no > > checking for mingw32 environment... no > > checking for executable suffix... configure: error: installation or > > configuration problem: compiler cannot create executables. > > > > I don't know why this error occurs, because when I compile other programs > > like I htdig for example this didn't happen. > > If you know someone who compiled this using cygwin , u know what to > > do.... > > > > That's all....... > > > > > > Another question: why are you using Aspseek and not ht:/ Dig ?? > > > > > > Well, just because we wrote it :-0 > > > > > > Actually aspseek was written because ht://Dig is just not capable enough. > > > For example, ht://Dig can't search for phrases, can't index and search > > > 10M documents fast, don't do excerpts, its relevance is lower (that > > > means results produced are much less relevant than those of aspseek). > > > There are a number of other shortcomings in ht://Dig as well; I believe > > > users who tried both engines will tell you more. > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Alexander F Avdonkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 12:54 AM > > > > Subject: Re: AW: [aseek-users] several questions to index > > > > > > > > > ASPseek doesn't work under Windows > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mozdesigners ?????(?): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any other free compiler available for win 32 ? > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 6:16 AM > > > > > > Subject: AW: AW: [aseek-users] several questions to index > > > > > > cygwin is for win32 i use a linux box, so i have used > > > > > > gcc.... Markus Rietzler > > > > > > * kommunikation & online service > > > > > > * RZF NRW > > > > > > * Tel: 0211.4572-130 > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > > > > > > Von: mozdesigners > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2002 00:53 > > > > > > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Betreff: Re: AW: [aseek-users] several questions > > > > > > to indexDear mr Markus Rietzler, I would like to > > > > > > know what program didi you used to compile > > > > > > aspseek? Cygwin isn't a good compiler! :( > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 7551596 Phone +7 903 6722750 > > > Hard work may not kill you, but why take chances? > > > -- > > > > > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 7551596 Phone +7 903 6722750 > Hard work may not kill you, but why take chances? > -- > -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dan Wilder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Technical Manager & Editor SSC, Inc. P.O. Box 55549 Phone: 206-782-8808 Seattle, WA 98155-0549 URL http://embedded.linuxjournal.com/ -----------------------------------------------------------------
