> Olivier Dubuisson wrote:
> >
> > Ed Day wrote:
> > >
> > > I have run across some syntax and am not quite sure how to apply the
> > > PER-visible constraints. The syntax is as follows:
> > >
> > > Id ::= INTEGER (IdSet)
> > >
> > > IdSet INTEGER ::= { IDs, ... }
> > >
> > > IDs ::= INTEGER (0..65535)
> > >
> > > My guess is that Id reduces to one of the two following expressions:
> > >
> > > Id ::= INTEGER (0..65535)
> > >
> > > or
> > >
> > > Id ::= INTEGER (0..65535,...)
> >
> > The latter is the right one.
Oops, sorry, I've been confused with your reference named and replied
for IdSet.
The *former* applies for "Id".
--
Olivier DUBUISSON
france telecom R&D
_ DTL/MSV - 22307 Lannion Cedex - France
( ) tel: +33 2 96 05 38 50 - fax: +33 2 96 05 39 45
/.\/ --------------------------------------
\_/\ Site ASN.1 : http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/
