On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Ed Day wrote: > We have dealt with this problem and others like it using the infamous "lex > tie-in" that is prevalent in the SNACC code. That is to say swallow the > whole thing up and deal with it on the back end essentially emulating > multi-token look aheads. It isn't pretty, but it works.
Agreed. Any number of tools cope fine with the BNF as it is, I don't see the need for a change. Remember that ASN.1 is not LR(1). Bancroft
