In our http://programmingscala.com book, we have a brief section on
using AJ with Scala. It would be great to write front end parsers in
diff JVM languages for the join point language. Scala's traits can
work like advice for single JPs, bit quantification is still missing.
@deanwampler
Programmingscala.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 20, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Michael McCray <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if it is required that AspectJ is tied to the Java
Language? I see that is what the J is for, but there are some new
languages like JavaFX and Scala that I don't think have supporting
aspect extension languages. There is http://functionaljava.org/, a
variant of Java that supports closures and other functional language
concepts. What if AspectJ could become AspectJVM and support other
JVM languages? I understand LTW can do much of what I ask, how far
off is LTW from a real integration? I mean it would be nice to
write my aspect code using other language features as well at least
this would not be possible until the aspectj language specification
changed.
Why not add closures to AspectJ to support it's usage in aspects?
How is it decided to evolve the language?
Mike
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
