Can I read that section now for free?
I promise to buy the book when it's out ;)
On 20 Jul 2009, at 14:10, Dean Wampler wrote:
In our http://programmingscala.com book, we have a brief section on
using AJ with Scala. It would be great to write front end parsers in
diff JVM languages for the join point language. Scala's traits can
work like advice for single JPs, bit quantification is still missing.
@deanwampler
Programmingscala.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 20, 2009, at 9:02 AM, Michael McCray <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if it is required that AspectJ is tied to the Java
Language? I see that is what the J is for, but there are some new
languages like JavaFX and Scala that I don't think have supporting
aspect extension languages. There is http://functionaljava.org/, a
variant of Java that supports closures and other functional
language concepts. What if AspectJ could become AspectJVM and
support other JVM languages? I understand LTW can do much of what
I ask, how far off is LTW from a real integration? I mean it would
be nice to write my aspect code using other language features as
well at least this would not be possible until the aspectj language
specification changed.
Why not add closures to AspectJ to support it's usage in aspects?
How is it decided to evolve the language?
Mike
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
