Hi Peter, On problem (2), please see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=317743 . I've attached a patch with instructions on how to apply it to aspectjweaver 1.6.9. It is a pair of problems causing you a big headache (both bugs). The use of annotation style rather than code style aspects makes the problem far worse. The patch should address it - can you try it and let me know? (append a comment on the bug report)
cheers, Andy On 23 June 2010 11:45, Andy Clement <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Peter, > > If you can come up with a simple failing scenario, that would be > awesome! If we are quick enough, there may be room to resolve this > for 1.6.9. > > cheers, > Andy > > On 23 June 2010 10:59, Peter Melnikov <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello >> Andy, >> I have forgotten to say I use 1.6.8 version >>> >>> On your aop.xml file, I hope you are including the aspect with your >>> >>> include within clause. I can't tell as you didn't say which package >>> >>> it was in. You may have issues if your aspect is not in the >>> >>> net.mansion package hierarchy. >> >> >> Yes you are right it is in net.mansion.logging package that is included in >> aop.xml. The aspect class is deployed under WEB-INF/lib as a jar file. >>> >>> On problem (2) I vaguely recall a bugzilla related to that, but can't >>> >>> find it in a quick search. You should open a separate one for that >>> >>> issue. >> >> I did a look and found a message that describes the same problem: >> http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/aspectj-users/msg10323.html >> I will think how to come up with reproduceable test cases for both issues. >> regards, >> Peter >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> >> > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
