2010/7/13 Ramnivas Laddad <[email protected]> > Well, a tool won't tell you what is wrong with the code, since it doesn't > know what you intend to express. If you can show example code of what you > intend to advise, perhaps someone can help you (it is really difficult to > know what you want from the email).
I described in the first post on this subject what I was trying to do and included the code that is not getting properly advised. Did you see that one? > > For you earlier question, the fact that you are using IntelliJ may be a > part of the problem. Its support, while has improved a lot recently, in > nowhere as good as that in Eclipse. So you may want to give Eclipse+AJDT a > try. > This is a case where being on eclipse would apparently be beneficial. I'll need to assess the time investment to set the project up in that env. thx > -Ramnivas > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Stephen Boesch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So here's an example: I have code below that does not work. How can I >> found out what's wrong with it? >> The intention is to advise all get*() methods in the dao class. Well >> that part works alone, but when adding in the "notInMethods" pointcut, then >> nothing works. So what tooling can tell me why nothing gets advised >> anymore? >> >> @Pointcut(value = "execution(public * *.getManagedClass())") >> public void notInMethods() { >> } >> >> @Around(value = "!notInMethods() && execution(public * *.get* (..)) && >> this(dao)", argNames = "thisJoinPoint, dao") >> >> >> 2010/7/13 Stephen Boesch <[email protected]> >> >> The development process for aspectj is proving to be very cumbersome / >>> slow for a non-adept. I'd like clear understanding of the selection process >>> of pointcut's, to know what's going on and why my pointcut expressions are >>> not performing as expected. >>> >>> What are options for tooling? >>> >>> Also, should I move away from @AspectJ and use the traditional ajc >>> compiler to get more information and better support? >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > >
_______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
