Ron DiFrango, 29.08.2012 16:35: > Or, is proceed sort of a generic delegator, can't a base Aspect > class be created that wraps the common functionality into it and > just accepts the message as the parameter and executes the code as > required?
Thanks for this suggestion, Ron. As I said in my answer to Andy Clement: There is always a way to work around limitations, and I found one. But work-arounds are (at least for me) also always some kind of mental "breakpoint" to stop and think about possible alternatives which might not even exist yet, but be desireable. Regards -- Alexander Kriegisch _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
