Hey, > Back to my question: Do you think it might be possible to make proceed() > calls joinpoints in future AspectJ versions?
Anything is possible but as with other language change requests it needs compelling use cases and a decent amount of interest from the community. By all means raise the enhancement request but without a few votes/comments supporting it, it is unlikely to bubble up the priority list. I am always extremely careful about introducing new joinpoints as suddenly they will be matched by all pointcuts out there which were not written to exclude them (because they didn't know they needed to). The most recently added array related joinpoints still only exist if deliberately switched on by the user via an option. I do know there are places where we have problems of requiring code duplication on the part of the user, for example parameter annotation matching, and that's unfortunate. But it is hard (with limited resource) to justify the effort of fixing those when there are more fundamental problems that cannot be fixed by asking the user to duplicate a few lines. cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
