Hi, I have other users asking for static ITDs on interfaces too - there is a placeholder bug: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=369261 - if you want to add your use cases to that, it would help shape the feature.
Andy On 4 September 2012 10:03, Henrique Rebêlo <h...@cin.ufpe.br> wrote: > Hi Andy, > >> The fact that it works when you comment out the decp and directly add >> 'I extends I2' indicates it is an AspectJ bug. Please raise it at: >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=AspectJ > > > Thanks! > >> I can imagine this is broken as it isn't a very common pattern that I see. > > > Yes. Indeed, this is one (tricky) way I figured out to add a static field in > an interface. Do you have other suggestions that can work better? The hope > is that in future ITD of static methods and fields work in interfaces. > Anyway, I'll raise the bug... > > cheers, > Henrique > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Andy Clement <andrew.clem...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> The fact that it works when you comment out the decp and directly add >> 'I extends I2' indicates it is an AspectJ bug. Please raise it at: >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=AspectJ >> >> I can imagine this is broken as it isn't a very common pattern that I see. >> >> cheers, >> Andy >> >> On 31 August 2012 14:51, Henrique Rebêlo <h...@cin.ufpe.br> wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > Consider the following code: >> > >> > public interface I {} >> > >> > public interface I2 { >> > public class InnerClass{ >> > public static int i; >> > } >> > } >> > >> > public aspect A { >> > >> > declare parents: I extends I2; >> > >> > before(): execution(* I+.(..)){ >> > boolean b = I.InnerClass.i >= 0; >> > } >> > } >> > >> > This code does not compile when I use the declare parents. It does not >> > recognize the inherited inner class. So, it complains when trying to >> > access >> > the static field i. If I comment the declare parents line, and >> > explicitly >> > make the interface I to extend the Interface I2, the code compiles. Is >> > there >> > something wrong? or Is it a compiler's bug related to the declare >> > parents? >> > >> > cheers, >> > Henrique >> > -- >> > >> > ............................................................................................................................... >> > Henrique Rebelo >> > http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr >> > Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > aspectj-users mailing list >> > aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > > > > -- > ............................................................................................................................... > Henrique Rebelo > http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr > Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
