You need a bugzilla account, which I think you can create on here: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/
Andy On 4 September 2012 11:15, Henrique Rebêlo <h...@cin.ufpe.br> wrote: > Hi Andy, > >> I have other users asking for static ITDs on interfaces too - there is >> a placeholder bug: >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=369261 - if you want to >> add your use cases to that, it would help shape the feature. > > > Thanks! In order to vote on a feature or raise a bug, a login and password > is required... Where Should I create one? The one related to the > aspectj-users is the one to be used there? > > Henrique > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Andy Clement <andrew.clem...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I have other users asking for static ITDs on interfaces too - there is >> a placeholder bug: >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=369261 - if you want to >> add your use cases to that, it would help shape the feature. >> >> Andy >> >> On 4 September 2012 10:03, Henrique Rebêlo <h...@cin.ufpe.br> wrote: >> > Hi Andy, >> > >> >> The fact that it works when you comment out the decp and directly add >> >> 'I extends I2' indicates it is an AspectJ bug. Please raise it at: >> >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=AspectJ >> > >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> >> I can imagine this is broken as it isn't a very common pattern that I >> >> see. >> > >> > >> > Yes. Indeed, this is one (tricky) way I figured out to add a static >> > field in >> > an interface. Do you have other suggestions that can work better? The >> > hope >> > is that in future ITD of static methods and fields work in interfaces. >> > Anyway, I'll raise the bug... >> > >> > cheers, >> > Henrique >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Andy Clement <andrew.clem...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> The fact that it works when you comment out the decp and directly add >> >> 'I extends I2' indicates it is an AspectJ bug. Please raise it at: >> >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/enter_bug.cgi?product=AspectJ >> >> >> >> I can imagine this is broken as it isn't a very common pattern that I >> >> see. >> >> >> >> cheers, >> >> Andy >> >> >> >> On 31 August 2012 14:51, Henrique Rebêlo <h...@cin.ufpe.br> wrote: >> >> > Hi all, >> >> > >> >> > Consider the following code: >> >> > >> >> > public interface I {} >> >> > >> >> > public interface I2 { >> >> > public class InnerClass{ >> >> > public static int i; >> >> > } >> >> > } >> >> > >> >> > public aspect A { >> >> > >> >> > declare parents: I extends I2; >> >> > >> >> > before(): execution(* I+.(..)){ >> >> > boolean b = I.InnerClass.i >= 0; >> >> > } >> >> > } >> >> > >> >> > This code does not compile when I use the declare parents. It does >> >> > not >> >> > recognize the inherited inner class. So, it complains when trying to >> >> > access >> >> > the static field i. If I comment the declare parents line, and >> >> > explicitly >> >> > make the interface I to extend the Interface I2, the code compiles. >> >> > Is >> >> > there >> >> > something wrong? or Is it a compiler's bug related to the declare >> >> > parents? >> >> > >> >> > cheers, >> >> > Henrique >> >> > -- >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ............................................................................................................................... >> >> > Henrique Rebelo >> >> > http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr >> >> > Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > aspectj-users mailing list >> >> > aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> aspectj-users mailing list >> >> aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > ............................................................................................................................... >> > Henrique Rebelo >> > http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr >> > Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > aspectj-users mailing list >> > aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> aspectj-users mailing list >> aspectj-users@eclipse.org >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > > > > > -- > ............................................................................................................................... > Henrique Rebelo > http://www.cin.ufpe.br/~hemr > Informatics Center, UFPE, Brazil > > _______________________________________________ > aspectj-users mailing list > aspectj-users@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users > _______________________________________________ aspectj-users mailing list aspectj-users@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
