----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Atkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gary Setter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <aspell-devel@gnu.org> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 12:18 AM Subject: Re: [aspell-devel] MSYS patch
> On Sun, 6 Feb 2005, Gary Setter wrote: > > > Whould you consider saving the the handle of the aspell lib at > > the time you do your LoadLibrary and define get_module_handle() > > to return that handle? > > Please submit a patch. > My plan was to submit that patch at the time each exported function was marked with the ASPELL_API macro. I could submit that in the next day or two, but until the c interface is complete, the marking of exported functions will be incomplete. > > What types of things are you exporting from your version of the > > dll? The 0.5 version exported a lot of class methods and whole > > classes. > > They are needed for the Aspell utility only. No other program should be > using them. > That is interesting. I consider the utility a good test for wether the api is complete. > > I thought the project was moving in the direction of a c > > only interface. Are we there yet? > > No. Its is getting closer. > Release early, release often? What about the generated files? I can visualize aspell.h being generated based on the ASPELL_API macro, but I still don't understand how something like check_info.hpp is generated. I just searched all the files distributed with the last alpha, and CheckInfo only shows up in check_info.hpp. Are all the "Automatically generated file." comments up to date? _______________________________________________ Aspell-devel mailing list Aspell-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aspell-devel
