On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Lars Aronsson wrote: > > When I misstyped "oc" in Swedish, the suggestions given were: > ock, Og, ok, OCR, och, AC, DC, PC, WC, oj, om, or, os, pc > > For any Swedish speaker, the obvious alternative is "och", which means > "and", probably the most frequent word in the language, but Aspell > presented four other words as more likely. > > Shouldn't probability or frequency be weighed in when Aspell > determines which correct word is most likely?
I have considered doing that for a long time. It would defiantly help. I have also considered doing so on a per document basis. I just never got around to doing so. -- http://kevin.atkinson.dhs.org _______________________________________________ Aspell-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aspell-user
