<<<'ULFA does not need any justification for independence'>>>
Britsh left.
The East India Company tricked inand stayed put.Brits left-so it's ours back again.
That's it
mm
From: "Rajen Barua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "mc mahant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Chan Mahanta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Assam] Well-oiled Assam sits pretty - Telegraph
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:25:58 -0600
Why it is so difficult?Let us take one statement at a time:ONE'ULFA does not need any justification for independence'Does the above statement make sense? The meaning is ULFA is not trying (or does not want) to justify or debate why they need independence.RB----- Original Message -----From: Chan MahantaTo: mc mahant ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 9:14 PMSubject: Re: [Assam] Well-oiled Assam sits pretty - TelegraphIts phoolosophical stuff, not meant for comprehension by ordinary humans.At 8:13 AM +0530 1/24/06, mc mahant wrote:<<<One (ULFA) does not need any justification for independence.The other (ULFA supporters) try to justify while there may not be any justification.Once this is clear, you will understand better why some news are no news to some.Does it make sense?....>>>
None!mm
_______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
