I meant that the judge will decide a case based on the evidence presented. If no witnesses come forth - or later "trun hostile" under pressure from the other party -- it is the police which is to be blames which cannot protect citizens from thugs. Courts come in the picture later. Thats what I thought.
Umesh
Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>it is not the justice system - the law and order system which is responsible.
*** Can you explain what you assert here and why you do so, Umesh?
cm
At 3:45 AM +0000 2/28/06, umesh sharma wrote:
>I have been following this story like many similar ones - it is not
>the justice system - the law and order system which is responsible.
>If all the witnesses refuse to testify - thanks to threats, bribes
>and trudgery of long visits to courts for years - then you cannot
>blame the judges as having biased judgement.
>
>It is similar to mafia rule where witnesses "turn hostile." It
>happened famously in Parliamentarian DP Yadav's sons alleged killing
>of their sister's lover -after he danced "opnely' with her on his
>birthday near Delhi. The deceased was son of a senior IAS official.
>
>Whats the cure. Those who have been in US for long can perhaps
>enlighten how the mafia bosses were rif off.
>
>Umesh
Umesh Sharma
5121 Lackawanna ST
College Park, MD 20740
1-202-215-4328 [Cell Phone]
Ed.M. - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of 2005
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre.
_______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
