Subject:  Efforts for Britain & France Union is nothing new !

 

Dear friends,



The subject of the posting below "Britain & France "union"!!! Proponents of 
Assam insideIndia should take note of this report. Unfortunately forAssam, some 
fools made a nightmare of Henri Souto for France,a reality in case of Assam"  
needs attention. 

 

Using the word "Secret" several times, a presenter at a BBC site, Mr. Mike 
Thomson is trying to turn the episode of "Britain & France Union" into an 
extra-ordinary idea so much so that it stunned the Nationalist MP Jacques 
Myard.  

 

"Seeing these words for the first time, Henri Soutou, professor of contemporary 
history at Paris's Sorbonne University almost fell off his chair" and started 
to stammer and stutter miserably.

 

However, if the so called history professor read history, or the said honorable 
MP read Churchill's 1948  book "Their Finest Hour" , they would have seen that, 
during the Second World War, the Union of Britain & France was proposed by 
Winston Churchill by his letter dated June 13, 1940 to the then French Prime 
Minister M. Reynaud.

 

Had Jacques Myard and Henri Soutou read the widely circulated Churchill books 
on WWII, they could have avoided getting stunned, falling off the chair and 
stammering/stuttering inconsolably as they read that French Prime Minister, 
Monsieur Guy Mollet repeated the same offer 16 years later on 10 September 1956.

 

It is a matter of abundant absurdity that some correspondent in the net is 
trying to describe the so called "nightmare of Henri Souto for France" as "a 
reality in case of Assam" and is trying to feel sorry for Assam with phrases 
like "Unfortunately for Assam", etc. 

 

Just because some well-wishers recently mentioned a "Dutch Connection" in a 
quickly drafted petition to Assam's Chief Minister, correspondents need not be 
tickled to use an irrelevant "Britain & France Connection" to pity Assam.  

 

It is now their turn to get stunned, to fall off the chair, stammer and stutter 
as many times they need because their simile of Britain & France Union is 
absolutely immaterial here ----- India is a sovereign country and Assam is 
India, like Kerala is India, Maharashtra Is India, Gujarat is India ..  

 

The Assamese are solid people --- we do not need sympathy or pity from 
weaklings --- in fact Assam has protected helpless refugees many times in the 
past. 

 

 

With the best wishes,

Himendra

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bartta Bistar 
  To: AssamNet 
  Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 2:58 AM
  Subject: [Assam] Britain & France "union"!!! Proponents of Assam insideIndia 
should take note of this report. Unfortunately forAssam, some fools made a 
nightmare of Henri Souto for France,a reality in case of Assam.


  When Britain and France nearly married 

        By Mike Thomson 
        Presenter, Document 
       

   http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6261885.stm


       
  Formerly secret documents unearthed from the National Archives have showed 
Britain and France considered a "union" in the 1950s. 

  On 10 September 1956 French Prime Minister Guy Mollet arrived in London for 
talks with his British counterpart, Anthony Eden. 

  These were troubled times for Mollet's France. Egypt's President Gamel Abdel 
Nasser had nationalised the Suez Canal and, as if that was not enough, he was 
also busy funding separatists in French Algeria, fuelling a bloody mutiny that 
was costing the country's colonial masters dear. 

  Monsieur Mollet was ready to fight back and he was determined to get 
Britain's help to do it. 

  Formerly secret documents held in Britain's National Archives in London, 
which have lain virtually unnoticed since being released two decades ago, 
reveal the extraordinary proposal Mollet was about to make. 


       

        Really I am stuttering because this idea is so preposterous" 


        Henri Soutou
        Historian
       
  The following is an extract from a British government cabinet paper of the 
day. It reads: 

  "When the French Prime Minister, Monsieur Mollet was recently in London he 
raised with the prime minister the possibility of a union between the United 
Kingdom and France." 

  Mollet was desperate to hit back at Nasser. He was also an Anglophile who 
admired Britain both for its help in two world wars and its blossoming welfare 
state. 

  There was another reason, too, that the French prime minister proposed this 
radical plan. 

  Tension was growing at this time along the border between Israel and Jordan. 
France was an ally of Israel and Britain of Jordan. If events got out of 
control there, French and British soldiers could soon be fighting each other. 

  With the Suez issue on the boil Mollet could not let such a disaster happen. 

  Secret document 

  So, when Eden turned down his request for a union between France and Britain 
the French prime minister came up with another proposal. 

  This time, while Eden was on a visit to Paris, he requested that France be 
allowed to join the British Commonwealth. 

  A secret document from 28 September 1956 records the surprisingly 
enthusiastic way the British premier responded to the proposal when he 
discussed it with his Cabinet Secretary, Sir Norman Brook. 

  It says: "Sir Norman Brook asked to see me this morning and told me he had 
come up from the country consequent on a telephone conversation from the prime 
minister who is in Wiltshire. 

  "The PM told him on the telephone that he thought in the light of his talks 
with the French: 

    a.. "That we should give immediate consideration to France joining the 
Commonwealth
    b.. "That Monsieur Mollet had not thought there need be difficulty over 
France accepting the headship of her Majesty
    c.. "That the French would welcome a common citizenship arrangement on the 
Irish basis"
  Seeing these words for the first time, Henri Soutou, professor of 
contemporary history at Paris's Sorbonne University almost fell off his chair. 

  Stammering repeatedly he said: "Really I am stuttering because this idea is 
so preposterous. The idea of joining the Commonwealth and accepting the 
headship of Her Majesty would not have gone down well. If this had been 
suggested more recently Mollet might have found himself in court." 

  Textbooks 

  Nationalist MP Jacques Myard was similarly stunned on being shown the papers, 
saying: "I tell you the truth, when I read that I am quite astonished. I had a 
good opinion of Mr Mollet before. I think I am going to revise that opinion. 

  "I am just amazed at reading this because since the days I was learning 
history as a student I have never heard of this. It is not in the textbooks." 

  It seems that the French prime minister decided to quietly forget about his 
strange proposals. 

  No record of them seems to exist in the French archives and it is clear that 
he told few other ministers of the day about them. 

  This might well be because after Britain decided to pull out of Suez, the 
battle against President Nasser was lost and all talk of union died too. 

  Instead, when the EEC was born the following year, France teamed up with 
Germany while Britain watched on. The rest, it seems, is history. 

  Document's A Marriage Cordial will be broadcast on Radio 4 at 2000 GMT on 
Monday. 







_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to