Dear Sir:

I don't send e-mails to people I don't know.

You receive these, because of a very simple reason: You subscribe to assamnet. I would have thought, that you as an internet user and thus a relatively well informed person, would have been able to figure that out all by yourself. But I am pleased to help out the clueless when I can.

Now, if my posts give you heart-burn, you have several options to deal with it:

        A: Take Milk of Magnesia or eat Khaar.
        B: Don't read the posts that I send. What you don't read, won't
           hurt you. Ignorance is indeed bliss.
        C: Make a filter to block posts that originate from my IP address.
        D: Un-subscribe from assamnet.
        E: But the most effective solution is to speak out, rationally that is
           and rebut or refute what you do not agree with. This is the best
           medicine for your ailment. And it will also make you smarter. You
           will appear intelligent, increase your circle of admirers, and who
           knows, someday may even get a prize for something.

           How do I know?

           Because I have given this prescription out many times before.
           Trust me--it DOES WORK!

And don't ever send another clueless mail like this. Not that it hurts me: It makes you look very bad. And I like to think you don't deserve it.

Take care.

cm







At 2:31 PM +0000 2/23/07, Indu Bhusan Nath wrote:


Dear Sir,
I have been continously recieving such mails from you for the last few days.
I would be glad if you would spend a little of you valuable time in explaining to me about what reason you are sending such mails.

Thanking you.
Yours truly,
Indu Bhusan Nath.





On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 Chan Mahanta wrote :
Well researched indeed! - Arent they cut pastes from various desi "rags" such >as Outlook India.

*** The quality of a newspaper is to be judged from the quality of the articles, opinions and news contained there-in, which are easily discernable by people with ordinary amount of intelligence.

How does Outlook India fare on that, compared to say, the English mouthpieces from Assam or such jewels of the desi media as The Statesman, The Telegraph, The Indian Express ? I'll let netters decide that for themselves.

Did you know that Arundhati was once caught peddling drugs in Goa with a Firang >boyfriend.

*** No I did not. And I also did not know that she once cheated on her high school test, that she drinks alcohol and smokes 'bhang', that she wears western clothes and does not wear a 'bindi', that she reads books banned in India, that she has Pakistani friends, that she does not go to temples, that she is a vegan, that she was paid to speak in a New York conference known to espouse liberal causes and other such high-crimes and misdemeanors.

But what does that have to do with the quality of what she wrote in this article and the substantiation for the opinions she expressed, the substantiation being documentation in the public record and thus very easily verifiable and /or challenged? Have anyone been able to rebut anything she put forth in this piece?
Dont trust junkie "activists".

*** Words of the wise no doubt. But it really amounts to bad mouthing someone when one cannot rebut or refute what gives one heart-burn. Not something a mature and intelligent person would indulge in.

Also remember how she melodramatically asked 13 questions on this issue - like >as if she would have had 14 questions if the attack was on the 14th of Dec.

*** Is this the coup-de-grace to finally put to rest AR's arguments?

There is also a video on the net which says that Sep 11 is actually the >handiwork of the CIA, FBI etc...another one also on man's first moon landing >and it says it was a hoax played on us people :-)

*** Uh-huh! I know that. I also know of other similar theories and beliefs about everything imaginable under the sun that Indians are mired in, including its world class brain-trust.
 >
But again, what does that have to do with the price of tea in China, or for that matter with what AR writes in the article in question?


cm


At 2:15 AM -0800 2/23/07, SANDIP DUTTA wrote:
Well researched indeed! - Arent they cut pastes from various desi "rags" such as Outlook India.

Did you know that Arundhati was once caught peddling drugs in Goa with a Firang boyfriend. I remember reading that in Telegraph in a biography on her published after she won the Booker prize.

Dont trust junkie "activists".

Also remember how she melodramatically asked 13 questions on this issue - like as if she would have had 14 questions if the attack was on the 14th of Dec.

There is also a video on the net which says that Sep 11 is actually the handiwork of the CIA, FBI etc...another one also on man's first moon landing and it says it was a hoax played on us people :-)


Rgds,
Sandip

----- Original Message ----
 From: Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ram Sarangapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 4:53:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] From the AT

Ram:

You don't have to take my word for it. But if you go do your homework, I am sure you will see the travesty .

I learned only because I read Arundhati Roy's well researched and documented article. I think I posted it in Assam Net. She was challenged by one Chandan Das, a journalist I think, about her pointing fingers to the need for a trigger to launch a war against Pakistan. But she had her homework done thoroughly and proved her point clearly from the published utterances by both ABV and another big name in the NDA govt. You will find it all in the archives of Outlook India.

c-da









At 11:44 AM -0600 2/20/07, Ram Sarangapani wrote:

C'da,



I am sure what you say is correct (about Afzal). From what little I read about the case in the media, I came out with the impression that he was deep into it.



>more than likely, were created by Indian spooks at the behest of the highest echelons of >government in a scheme to provide the excuse for a war with Pakistan that went awry. They >are either six-feet under or are safely stowed away by the same keepers of the Justice



I, obviously, did not realize the extent to which the GOI and its spooks would go to orchestrate such a sinister plot. :)



But then, I would have to go back and do my home work (and revisit this topic)



--Ram







On 2/20/07, Chan Mahanta <<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  >Are you saying, Afzal is innocent?




*** That is a misleading question. INNOCENT of WHAT?




A capital crime? Not to anyone who has an ordinary amount of reasoning ability and is willing to look at the public record of the trials and the cooked evidence. The world knows he was framed by Indian justice system. Even the SC's own words sending him to the gallows are damning. Why do you think they haven't done a Saddam on him yet? It is not the fear of Kashmiris rising in outrage, but of world opinion.




Yes, Afzal did play a small role in the conspiracy. But it does not amount to a capital crime. Circumstantial evidence abounds to indicate that the real culprits, more than likely, were created by Indian spooks at the behest of the highest echelons of government in a scheme to provide the excuse for a war with Pakistan that went awry. They are either six-feet under or are safely stowed away by the same keepers of the Justice.



















At 9:28 AM -0600 2/20/07, Ram Sarangapani wrote:

Wasn't Afzal the guy who attacked the Parliament (or masterminded it) and killed a number of guards?



I have not followed the case closely, but Afzal received the best justice that Indian conditions allow, and furthemore, had it been some other (low profile) person, Afzal would have already been hung - what with the righteous protests and evn Pakistan wanting the GOI to let Afzak go free.
 >>>


Are you saying, Afzal is innocent?



--Ram



On 2/20/07, Chan Mahanta <<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

No, I am overwhelmed by the righteous assurances of delivering JUSTICE.




Just ask Mohammed Afzal, sentenced to hang in the Parliament Shooting case.


















At 8:43 AM -0600 2/20/07, Ram Sarangapani wrote:

I hope we are not confusing the PM (or the GOI) with the LeT (who supposedly blew up the train).



--Ram



On 2/20/07, Chan Mahanta <<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

India will ensure punishment of guilty: PM
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh today assured Pakistan that India was committed to doing everything possible to ensure that perpetrators of the "heinous" terrorist act on Samjhauta Express were punished, reports










*** I am overwhelmed!


_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
<http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org>http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org








_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
<http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org>http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org



<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49938/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/>Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.<
http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49937/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/>Check
it out.
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org



<http://adworks.rediff.com/cgi-bin/AdWorks/sigclick.cgi/www.rediff.com/signature-home.htm/[EMAIL
 PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to