Re: [Assam] Discussions on a hypothetical scenario >I used the word "we" to represent the the netters who may wish to separate >themselves from Mr. Chandan Mahanta who spread the rumor about Dr. Mamoni R. >Goswami.
>Mr. Chandan Mahanta has failed to cite his sources of information. It is >possible that he is solely responsible for creating the rumour at 9:56 AM on >Thursday March 29, 2007 that "I have heard that the Congress >MPm from Guahati >has recommended that Mamoni R. Goswami be sent to oprison ...." >The netters may like to distance themselves from the network of >secret-informers of Mr. Chandan Mahanta. I would bet SOLID ONE INDIAN RUPEE if Hemenda can produce even one netter on his side who would come forward to support him in his above mission. Otherwise, may we request Himenda that he would be kind enough to withdraw his word "we" and change it to "I" from his statement? At least that much is demanded of a true Hindu to stay Sat-Sit-Anand. Rajen ----- Original Message ----- From: Himendra Thakur To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 5:18 AM Subject: Re: [Assam] Discussions on a hypothetical scenario Dear Members of Assam-net, I used the word "we" to represent the the netters who may wish to separate themselves from Mr. Chandan Mahanta who spread the rumor about Dr. Mamoni R. Goswami. Mr. Chandan Mahanta has failed to cite his sources of information. It is possible that he is solely responsible for creating the rumour at 9:56 AM on Thursday March 29, 2007 that "I have heard that the Congress MPm from Guahati has recommended that Mamoni R. Goswami be sent to oprison ...." The netters may like to distance themselves from the network of secret-informers of Mr. Chandan Mahanta. With best wishes to everybody, Himendra ----- Original Message ----- From: Chan Mahanta To: [email protected] ; barua25 Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 11:39 PM Subject: Re: [Assam] Discussions on a hypothetical scenario We demand that Mr. Chandan Mahanta come forward to tell us (1) where he got the news, (2) who told him, (3 & 4) who made what comment. If he collected his information from the mysterious "In the March 25 issue of an English daily" that has been quoted in the "Assam Tribune", we have a right to know the (5) source of this "English daily". *** WHO are this WE here? Is it a group of people or is it a royal we representing HT? *** I will be pleased to tell how I got word of the news. But FIRST I need to know WHY I should give it out? What is my obligation to HT on where or how I get my news? Where does HT or anybody else get that RIGHT to know my sources? Just for Ht's info, I have a lot of 'swrang-swas' ( secret informers) who keep me apprised of goings on in Assam, unlike his sources who had no info. on this now known to be particularly well-known controversy. NO, I did NOT get my info from the "English daily", as I explained in my first post. But what does that have to do with anything? So what if I did? And so what WHEN exactly I got my info? Finally, let us hear HT explain HOW "Mr. Chandan Mahanta is causing great harm to Mamoni"? That will be a lot of fun I am certain. Will HT be wiling to INFORM MRG that I am harming her? That CM is hurting her reputation by SPREADING this rumor or news? I challenge HT to do so, and see how MRG reacts to it. BTW,just for HT's info, I happen to know MRG. >The netters are interested to keep a credible standard of the assam-net and demand that Mr. Chandan Mahanta must reply to the above 5 questions directly. *** Really? Let HT make me do so. It will be fun to watch. cxm At 4:21 PM -0500 3/31/07, Himendra Thakur wrote: To Mr. Rajendra Barua Dear Barua, I thank you for your advice that "My suggestion will be, if you have leisure time, please try to do some constructive and creative work like MRG instead of trying to indulge in such personal attacks ----- " Your assumption that I am NOT doing any "constructive and creative work like MRG" is baseless and amounts to a "personal attack", because I am doing a number of constructive and creative work like MRG, but I don't have to report that to you. In future, such insinuations will be ignored. I did not ask for your advice. I am NOT giving you any advice. So, please do not give me any advice in future. As for your defense of Mr. Chandan Mahanta that "He was simply asking questions", I must inform you about an age-old adage that, when a person wishes to malign someone but does not want to take responsibility, or wants to keep a back door open through which he would be able to sneak out when confronted, he presents his malignance in the form of a "question". No wonder you are also raising another baseless question: "My bigger question is where do you have such leisure time trying to split hair in the net on a non issue." It is not a non-issue. IF you "simply fail to see where do you see Chandan trying ti hurt MRG", that is your problem. To open your eyes, I may cite an analogy how Erickson &/or Ved Mehta hurt Mahatma Gandhi posthumously by raising questions & discussions based on lies tabled by N.K. Bose eight years after the demise of the Mahatma. I am glad you have said "the news is also published in AT now." It is clear from the AT March 31 report that "Chaliha clarified that he had never said such a thing like arrest of the noted writer for maintaining links with ULFA", whereas Mr. Chandan Mahanta wrote at 9:56 AM on Thursday March 29, 2007 that "I have heard that the Congress MPm from Guahati has recommended that Mamoni R. Goswami be sent to oprison ..." By spreading the rumour (which is denied by Mr. Kirip Chaliha in AT), Mr. Chandan Mahanta is causing great harm to Mamoni. We demand that Mr. Chandan Mahanta come forward to tell us (1) where he got the news, (2) who told him, (3 & 4) who made what comment. If he collected his information from the mysterious "In the March 25 issue of an English daily" that has been quoted in the "Assam Tribune", we have a right to know the (5) source of this "English daily". This is not a personal attack. The netters are interested to keep a credible standard of the assam-net and demand that Mr. Chandan Mahanta must reply to the above 5 questions directly. With the best wishes, Himendra ----- Original Message ----- From: barua25 To: Himendra Thakur ; Gautam Choudhury Cc: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 2:08 PM Subject: Re: [Assam] Discussions on a hypothetical scenario Dear Hmenda: Frankly speaking it looks like you are trying to split the hair on a non issue. Chandan wrote: > I have heard that the Congress MPm from Guahati has recommended that Mamoni R. Goswami be sent to oprison for serving as an intermediary between ULFA and GoI or something to that effect. > > Does anyone have any info. on that? I have not seen any mention of that in the web version of the English language newspapers. > > Would appreciate any help from netters who know. > Mr Choudhury also stated that : Yes, this is true. The comment on Mamoni Raisom Goswami was made by Kirip Chaliha, MP Guwahati a few days back. In fact, this is a hot topic which is now being fought between Kirip Chaliha and Arabinda Rajkhowa . Arabinda Rajkhowa advised to throw Kirip Chaliha into Dustbin as a reaction and the fighting is going on. As Ram pointed out, the news is also published in AT now. From the above, I for one netter will say that I don't see anything wrong in Chandan's question to the netters. I donot think Chandan owes anything to the netters. He was simply asking questions. I simply fail to see where do you see Chandan trying ti hurt MRG. We may say, MRG has already elevated herself to the level of 'Odaryo' one which cannot be burnt by fire. My bigger question is where do you have such leisure time trying to split hair in the net on a non issue. My suggestion will be, if you have leisure time, please try to do some constructive and creative work like MRG instead of trying to indulge in such personal attacks which does not help anybody. I hope you will not take these comments personally. Thanks Rajen ----- Original Message ----- From: Himendra Thakur To: Gautam Choudhury Cc: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 9:08 AM Subject: Re: [Assam] Discussions on a hypothetical scenario Dear Choudhury, This is strange. You wrote "The comment on Mamoni Raisom Goswami was made by Kirip Chaliha, MP Guwahati a few days back." What did Mr. Kirip Chaliha say? Mr. Chandan Mahanta wrote at 9:56 AM on Thursday March 29, 2007 that "I have heard that the Congress MPm from Guahati has recommended that Mamoni R. Goswami be sent to oprison ...." Did Mr. Kirip Chaliha say what Mr. Chandan Mahanta is saying, or did Mr. Chandan Mahanta made up a part of it? We demand that Mr. Chandan Mahanta come forward to tell us where he got the news, who told him, at what time. He owes that to assamnet. Your comment "In fact, this is a hot topic which is now being fought between Kirip Chaliha and Arabinda Rajkhowa " is confusing because the persons with whom I talked by telephone have not heard about the so called "hot topic". The "hot topic" has not been reported in the printed media who has a responsibility to verify facts/sources before publication. I am still concerned that these rumours will hurt Mamoni. With the best wishes, Himendra ---- Original Message ----- From: Gautam Choudhury To: Himendra Thakur Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 12:43 AM Subject: Re: [Assam] Discussions on a hypothetical scenario Regards Gautam Choudhury ----- Original Message ---- From: Himendra Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Ram Sarangapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, 31 March, 2007 3:56:06 AM Subject: [Assam] Discussions on a hypothetical scenario Dear Ram, Mr. Chandan Mahanta posted the news at 9:56 AM on Thursday March 29, 2007. I made frantic telephone calls to India and found that people were surprised when I asked them about the news. Mr. Chandan Mahanta wrote at 9:56 AM on Thursday March 29, 2007 that "I have heard that the Congress MPm from Guahati has recommended that Mamoni R. Goswami be sent to oprison ...." We demand that Mr. Chandan Mahanta come forward to tell us where he got the news, who told him, at what time. These names and sources are very important. All discussions on a hypothetical scenario must be stopped because these are going to hurt Mamoni. I hope you will appreciate the concern. With the best wishes, Himendra ----- Original Message --- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Here¢s a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers ---------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org _______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
