Ram-da,

I agree with you partially. 

We do need rote memorization fr many things -- like learning new vocabulary 
words (ofcourse, you can improve your knowledge of these by different 
techniques - such as using them in own words, match the following, flash cards 
- etc --- but it all amounts to rote ). We all learn a language by rote (and 
practice) - same with  terms of history, biology etc. Ofcourse, the more you 
use these terms the better you get at remembering them.

Further, most Indian students have more practical experience than most in USA - 
atleast till they are teenagers. Tom Sawyer style of "adventurous learning" is 
no longer possible in USA - since no student/child (below age 14) can go 
anywhere without escort. Further, most  gardening, plumbing, auto 
repair/maintenance , cleaning is now done by hired staf in USA - so no 
practical learning about electricity and electrical and mechanical appliances.

Ofcourse, beyond the basic knowledge thru rote - one must learn to apply the 
knowledge in various situations - in which Indian student lack - mostly. Some 
intelliegent ones are able to put two and two together and get by - or go 
abroad.
That is street smartness - as the auhor wrote in his best seller book "What 
they don't teach at Harvard Business Schoo" - a required reading at HBS itself.

Umesh


Ram Sarangapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: C'da,
  
 Thanks for forwarding this rather well-written article. I must say, it makes 
wonderful reading and does make one have second thoughts about the quality of 
education that most of us have received from India. :)
   
 Even with that didactic//memorizing by rote background, I came away with a few 
of things here: :)
  
 The first, of course, is that people can be taught (often complex things) even 
if they have had no formal education. 
  
 The second, of course, is that, I find it a tad preposterous, that Dunu Roy 
thinks that education in India as "Instead, we have didactic instruction, 
memorising by rote, and vomiting out useless information for futile 
examinations... "
  
 The third, of course, is that according to Dunu Roy, the Govt. is pretty 
useless, ie. whatever they touched (his illustrations here) have been baseless, 
miscalculated, and ultimately, Roy and his group, had to go teach the 
"practical/down-to-earth" stuff to the affected people, and make the 
corrections.  
  
 I have no argument  with the first point - I do think it is highly possible to 
teach people to perform and operate complex procedures, if they are willing to 
learn and taught well.
  
 The notion that education in India is totally impractical I find it had to 
believe. You, me, and most NRIs have had this didactic education (including 
Roy). I really wonder, how, Roy & his group of intellectuals managed to get out 
of that mold?  
  
 Most Indians too have this background too. Then, how is it that they manage to 
do very well in this country? How is it that they have not only done well in 
school in this country, but have proved to be one of the smartest in opening up 
successful start-ups (not just IT), and doing great. 
 I don't know. Probably  Roy will tell us.
  
 On the third point, it is quite easy to take pot shots at the Govt. machinery. 
and its incompetence. While I commend Roy and his group (are they some anti-dam 
people:) in taking the trouble to do a better job teaching than the education 
system, I wonder, if Roy can recommend that method for the whole country, and 
if that will be workable. 
  
 --Ram
  
  
  
  
 On 6/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  Knowledge As Weapon 

Ordinary working people have the capacity to learn, to collect information, to 
look at it analytically, and eventually use it for bettering their own lives. 
This is, or should be, the central objective of "education". Instead, we have 
didactic instruction, memorising by rote, and vomiting out useless information 
for futile examinations... 
Dunu Roy

 It was some 30 years ago, in the mid-70s, that we got a glimpse of what the 
future might hold. We had just purchased 2 acres of land to build a workshop 
on, in the district of Shahdol in Madhya Pradesh. There had been some argument 
with the neighbouring owner about where exactly the boundary lay. So one day we 
dragged out the iron chain that surveyors use, and began measuring the land 
ourselves. A curious shepherd boy must have witnessed the proceedings, because 
next day a delegation of solemn farmers from the nearby village paid us a 
visit. They had heard that we were engineers, they explained, so could we teach 
them how to measure land? Why, we asked, whatever will you do with it? Well, 
they explained, the  patwari (the government revenue functionary at the 
village) had been demarcating their lands and they were never sure whether he 
was doing it right. So we spent the next four hours demonstrating how the chain 
worked and how to calculate the area. In the process, of
 course, we began to learn that the chain was called a  jareeb, the area was 
rakba, the khasra number referred to the record in the revenue department, 
their title was the patta, and the patwari presided over a khatauni in which 
all secrets were well documented.  
 A week later, the same delegation was back, but looking less solemn and more 
brashly conspiratorial. Could they borrow our jareeb? We handed over the chain 
and then, not a little puzzled ourselves, we followed them at a discreet 
distance. In due course, we arrived at the village and a curious spectacle 
greeted us. On the farms of the village, the  patwari was laying out his chain, 
and wherever he went, the farmers followed with their borrowed jareeb and laid 
it out in exactly the same manner. At every halt they would watch the patwari 
and when he began to enter figures in his notebook, they too would whip out a 
pencil and scribble on a piece of paper. Rarely had we seen a more harassed 
looking  patwari! At the end of the day, the delegation was back again, beaming 
from ear to ear. Thank you for the hathiyaar (weapon), they told us, and handed 
back the jareeb. Can we, we asked them, see what you wrote? They took out their 
smudged piece of paper and showed it to us. It was
 covered with a series of numbers in meaningless disorder. But, they grinned, 
they had taken care not to show it to the  patwari! 

This theme of knowledge as weapon has come back to us many times in the last 
three decades. In the mid-80s, a small party from the Palamau district of Bihar 
knocked on our door. Could we come to their village and see what the proposed 
dam on the Auranga river was going to do to their area? We said yes, but 
provided they were able to wrangle a copy of the DPR (Detailed Project Report) 
of the dam. Oh, no problem, they remarked, the irrigation department  chaprasi 
(peon) was from their village. So, three weeks later, we were rambling across 
the farmlands of Palamau inspecting the river and its catchment and comparing 
it to what was written in the DPR. We were faced with a battery of questions. 
Look at that river, exclaimed the villagers, do you think it can carry as much 
water as to irrigate all the lands the department is claiming it will? And can 
you see the silt in it; how long will it take for the dam to fill up? The 
department says that this village will come under
 submergence, and that one will not, when we can clearly see that this village 
is higher than that one! How can we challenge their views?  

We took four days to instruct a batch of 20 young boys from the surrounding 
villages how to measure the flow in the river, the silt load that it carried, 
and the slope of the land.With that, they said, they would be able to take on 
the project's claims of projected irrigation, the life of the dam, and the 
extent of submergence. On the last evening, as we were packing to leave the 
next morning, they eyed us suspiciously. Where, they asked, pointing to the 
"dumpy" (a kind of telescopic instrument that is used to measure levels), are 
you taking that? Well, we said, this is our instrument and we are taking it 
back; if you want one you will have to get it for yourselves. How much does it 
cost, they queried, and where is it available? The nearest place, we explained, 
would be Ranchi and it would cost about Rs 3000. And then we retired for the 
night. Only to be woken up by an exuberant hammering on the door very early the 
next morning. Here, they said, is Rs 3000 collected from
 donations by all the villagers, and you can go and buy the dumpy yourself; 
otherwise how will we fight a  yuddh (war) without an astra (weapon)? 

That the yuddh was joined became clear to us when, four months later, a parcel 
arrived with the postman. It contained a sheaf of papers containing the records 
of three months of daily measurement. We went to work on the data and came up 
with some very interesting findings indeed. The river, for instance, carried 
only half as much water in the monsoon months as the DPR claimed it did. This 
water also bore a silt load one-and-a-half times that of the figure reported in 
the project proposal. 25 villages were actually coming into the submergence 
zone, demarcated by following the full reservoir contour, as compared to the 19 
acknowledged by the project authorities. When all these were factored into the 
calculations the benefits actually came to less than the costs! This was going 
to be one very unviable dam indeed, we informed the people of Auranga. They, in 
turn, took the report and propagated it all over the area through posters and 
leaflets, while the English version was duly
 sent off to the governments, the media, the courts, and even the World Bank. 
Today, fifteen years later, the Auranga river remains unbound.  

In the mid-90s, we had another set of visitors, but this time from the high 
ranges of Kullu district in Himachal Pradesh. Their villages and hamlets were 
being threatened by the declaration of the Great Himalayan National Park. What 
exactly was this Park, they asked, and how could they protect their families? 
So, two months later, armed with the relevant documents and reports, we pitched 
camp in their village. A young bunch of grazers and farmers listened 
attentively as we explained how the government had commissioned a study in the 
80s and how this study, conducted by a pair of specialists from the Pheasant 
Society in the UK and Canada, had come to the conclusion that only by declaring 
the Park as a protected area could the rare Western Himalayan Tragopan (a 
ground-dwelling bird) be saved. And then, as we presented the details of the 
study, the listeners grew restive. No, they protested, it is not possible for 
the Tragopan to be disturbed by our herds because it nests in
 late winter and our grazers go up only in late spring. Even that figure of 
25,000 animals is wrong, they objected, our numbers rarely cross 12,000. And it 
is not us who destroy the herbs, but the Nepali labourers from the Terai, who 
are unfamiliar with alpine ecology and are hired by the traders in the plains.  

We suggested to them then that they should do their own study and compare their 
findings with what had been reported by the foreign experts. Very well, they 
responded immediately, tell us how to do the study. So, for the next two days, 
we demonstrated to them how to draw transects and conduct animal counts, how to 
document the diversity of grasses and shrubs, and how to systematically record 
their  observations.As soon as the snows melted, six of them headed towards the 
alpine meadows, following the same route that the scientists had taken ten 
years earlier. Two porters who had been taken along to ferry the supplies to 
base camp (at heights of over 3000 metres, one does not run into the occasional 
tea shop or restaurant!), became so familiar with the routines of measurement 
that they eventually became part of the study team. Six weeks later they 
returned, armed with a range of documented observations. A detailed examination 
of their records showed that they had successfully
 challenged every one of the findings of the government-sponsored study. In 
addition, their measurements indicated what was the carrying capacity of the 
meadows, how ruminants were in fact controlling weed infestation, and how the 
herbs could be harvested within the boundaries of conservation.  

This much, then, is certain: people fight their struggles for survival based on 
what knowledge they can create. Each one of the reports and studies cited above 
(and numerous others that have not been documented in both rural and urban 
areas) indicates that ordinary working people have the capacity to learn, to 
collect information, to look at it analytically, and eventually use it for 
bettering their own lives. This is, or should be, the central objective of 
"education". And yet, these are simple (and yet very complex) tasks that are 
not undertaken by our educational institutions. Didactic instruction, 
memorising by rote, and vomiting out useless information for futile 
examinations constitute the fundamentals of what passes for education in our 
schools and colleges. Perhaps there is a purpose to it all. Perhaps another 
Macaulay is required to explain it to us in yet another Minute. And perhaps, in 
some not too distant future, a group of young labourers will learn to document
 their own lives to tear this farce to pieces. 
 
---------------------------------
  A graduate (and post-graduate) from IIT Bombay, Dunu Roy heads Hazard Centre 
in New Delhi.


 
---------------------------------
 # You may be missing other accompanying blurbs, related stories, graphics etc.
Link to this story as it appears on the site :-  Knowledge As Weapon
 www.outlookindia.com  
---------------------------------
 
MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "203.200.89.96" claiming 
to be  Subscribe Online: Outlook Magazine


_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
 [email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org 



 _______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org



Umesh Sharma

Washington D.C. 

1-202-215-4328 [Cell]

Ed.M. - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of 2005

http://www.uknow.gse.harvard.edu/index.html (Edu info)

http://hbswk.hbs.edu/ (Management Info)




www.gse.harvard.edu/iep  (where the above 2 are used )




http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/
       
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up for 
your freeaccount today.
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to