Ram-da,
I agree with you partially.
We do need rote memorization fr many things -- like learning new
vocabulary words (ofcourse, you can improve your knowledge of these by
different techniques - such as using them in own words, match the following,
flash cards - etc --- but it all amounts to rote ). We all learn a language
by rote (and practice) - same with terms of history, biology etc. Ofcourse,
the more you use these terms the better you get at remembering them.
Further, most Indian students have more practical experience than most in
USA - atleast till they are teenagers. Tom Sawyer style of "adventurous
learning" is no longer possible in USA - since no student/child (below age
14) can go anywhere without escort. Further, most gardening, plumbing, auto
repair/maintenance , cleaning is now done by hired staf in USA - so no
practical learning about electricity and electrical and mechanical
appliances.
Ofcourse, beyond the basic knowledge thru rote - one must learn to apply
the knowledge in various situations - in which Indian student lack - mostly.
Some intelliegent ones are able to put two and two together and get by - or
go abroad.
That is street smartness - as the auhor wrote in his best seller book
"What they don't teach at Harvard Business Schoo" - a required reading at
HBS itself.
Umesh
*Ram Sarangapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* wrote:
C'da,
Thanks for forwarding this rather well-written article. I must say, it
makes wonderful reading and does make one have second thoughts about the
quality of education that most of us have received from India. :)
Even with that didactic//memorizing by rote background, I came away with
a few of things here: :)
The first, of course, is that people can be taught (often complex things)
even if they have had no formal education.
The second, of course, is that, I find it a tad preposterous, that Dunu
Roy thinks that education in India as "Instead, we have didactic
instruction, memorising by rote, and vomiting out useless information for
futile examinations... "
The third, of course, is that according to Dunu Roy, the Govt. is pretty
useless, ie. whatever they touched (his illustrations here) have been
baseless, miscalculated, and ultimately, Roy and his group, had to go teach
the "practical/down-to-earth" stuff to the affected people, and make the
corrections.
I have no argument with the first point - I do think it is highly
possible to teach people to perform and operate complex procedures, if they
are willing to learn and taught well.
The notion that education in India is totally impractical I find it had to
believe. You, me, and most NRIs have had this didactic education (including
Roy). I really wonder, how, Roy & his group of intellectuals managed to get
out of that mold?
Most Indians too have this background too. Then, how is it that they
manage to do very well in this country? How is it that they have not only
done well in school in this country, but have proved to be one of the
smartest in opening up successful start-ups (not just IT), and doing great.
I don't know. Probably Roy will tell us.
On the third point, it is quite easy to take pot shots at the Govt.
machinery. and its incompetence. While I commend Roy and his group (are they
some anti-dam people:) in taking the trouble to do a better job teaching
than the education system, I wonder, if Roy can recommend that method for
the whole country, and if that will be workable.
--Ram
On 6/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> *Knowledge As Weapon *
>
> Ordinary working people have the capacity to learn, to collect
> information, to look at it analytically, and eventually use it for bettering
> their own lives. This is, or should be, the central objective of
> "education". Instead, we have didactic instruction, memorising by rote, and
> vomiting out useless information for futile examinations...
> Dunu Roy
>
> It was some 30 years ago, in the mid-70s, that we got a glimpse of what
> the future might hold. We had just purchased 2 acres of land to build a
> workshop on, in the district of Shahdol in Madhya Pradesh. There had been
> some argument with the neighbouring owner about where exactly the boundary
> lay. So one day we dragged out the iron chain that surveyors use, and began
> measuring the land ourselves. A curious shepherd boy must have witnessed the
> proceedings, because next day a delegation of solemn farmers from the nearby
> village paid us a visit. They had heard that we were engineers, they
> explained, so could we teach them how to measure land? Why, we asked,
> whatever will you do with it? Well, they explained, the *patwari* (the
> government revenue functionary at the village) had been demarcating their
> lands and they were never sure whether he was doing it right. So we spent
> the next four hours demonstrating how the chain worked and how to calculate
> the area. In the process, of course, we began to learn that the chain was
> called a *jareeb*, the area was *rakba*, the *khasra* number referred to
> the record in the revenue department, their title was the *patta*, and
> the *patwari* presided over a *khatauni* in which all secrets were well
> documented.
> A week later, the same delegation was back, but looking less solemn and
> more brashly conspiratorial. Could they borrow our *jareeb*? We handed
> over the chain and then, not a little puzzled ourselves, we followed them at
> a discreet distance. In due course, we arrived at the village and a curious
> spectacle greeted us. On the farms of the village, the *patwari* was
> laying out his chain, and wherever he went, the farmers followed with their
> borrowed *jareeb* and laid it out in exactly the same manner. At every
> halt they would watch the *patwari* and when he began to enter figures
> in his notebook, they too would whip out a pencil and scribble on a piece of
> paper. Rarely had we seen a more harassed looking *patwari*! At the end
> of the day, the delegation was back again, beaming from ear to ear. Thank
> you for the *hathiyaar* (weapon), they told us, and handed back the *
> jareeb*. Can we, we asked them, see what you wrote? They took out their
> smudged piece of paper and showed it to us. It was covered with a series of
> numbers in meaningless disorder. But, they grinned, they had taken care not
> to show it to the *patwari*!
>
> This theme of knowledge as weapon has come back to us many times in the
> last three decades. In the mid-80s, a small party from the Palamau district
> of Bihar knocked on our door. Could we come to their village and see what
> the proposed dam on the Auranga river was going to do to their area? We said
> yes, but provided they were able to wrangle a copy of the DPR (Detailed
> Project Report) of the dam. Oh, no problem, they remarked, the irrigation
> department *chaprasi* (peon) was from their village. So, three weeks
> later, we were rambling across the farmlands of Palamau inspecting the river
> and its catchment and comparing it to what was written in the DPR. We were
> faced with a battery of questions. Look at that river, exclaimed the
> villagers, do you think it can carry as much water as to irrigate all the
> lands the department is claiming it will? And can you see the silt in it;
> how long will it take for the dam to fill up? The department says that this
> village will come under submergence, and that one will not, when we can
> clearly see that this village is higher than that one! How can we challenge
> their views?
>
> We took four days to instruct a batch of 20 young boys from the
> surrounding villages how to measure the flow in the river, the silt load
> that it carried, and the slope of the land.With that, they said, they
> would be able to take on the project's claims of projected irrigation, the
> life of the dam, and the extent of submergence. On the last evening, as we
> were packing to leave the next morning, they eyed us suspiciously. Where,
> they asked, pointing to the "dumpy" (a kind of telescopic instrument that is
> used to measure levels), are you taking that? Well, we said, this is our
> instrument and we are taking it back; if you want one you will have to get
> it for yourselves. How much does it cost, they queried, and where is it
> available? The nearest place, we explained, would be Ranchi and it would
> cost about Rs 3000. And then we retired for the night. Only to be woken up
> by an exuberant hammering on the door very early the next morning. Here,
> they said, is Rs 3000 collected from donations by all the villagers, and you
> can go and buy the dumpy yourself; otherwise how will we fight a *yuddh*(war)
without an
> *astra* (weapon)?
>
> That the yuddh was joined became clear to us when, four months later, a
> parcel arrived with the postman. It contained a sheaf of papers containing
> the records of three months of daily measurement. We went to work on the
> data and came up with some very interesting findings indeed. The river, for
> instance, carried only half as much water in the monsoon months as the DPR
> claimed it did. This water also bore a silt load one-and-a-half times that
> of the figure reported in the project proposal. 25 villages were actually
> coming into the submergence zone, demarcated by following the full reservoir
> contour, as compared to the 19 acknowledged by the project authorities. When
> all these were factored into the calculations the benefits actually came to
> less than the costs! This was going to be one very unviable dam indeed, we
> informed the people of Auranga. They, in turn, took the report and
> propagated it all over the area through posters and leaflets, while the
> English version was duly sent off to the governments, the media, the courts,
> and even the World Bank. Today, fifteen years later, the Auranga river
> remains unbound.
>
> In the mid-90s, we had another set of visitors, but this time from the
> high ranges of Kullu district in Himachal Pradesh. Their villages and
> hamlets were being threatened by the declaration of the Great Himalayan
> National Park. What exactly was this Park, they asked, and how could they
> protect their families? So, two months later, armed with the relevant
> documents and reports, we pitched camp in their village. A young bunch of
> grazers and farmers listened attentively as we explained how the government
> had commissioned a study in the 80s and how this study, conducted by a pair
> of specialists from the Pheasant Society in the UK and Canada, had come to
> the conclusion that only by declaring the Park as a protected area could the
> rare Western Himalayan Tragopan (a ground-dwelling bird) be saved. And then,
> as we presented the details of the study, the listeners grew restive. No,
> they protested, it is not possible for the Tragopan to be disturbed by our
> herds because it nests in late winter and our grazers go up only in late
> spring. Even that figure of 25,000 animals is wrong, they objected, our
> numbers rarely cross 12,000. And it is not us who destroy the herbs, but the
> Nepali labourers from the Terai, who are unfamiliar with alpine ecology and
> are hired by the traders in the plains.
>
> We suggested to them then that they should do their own study and
> compare their findings with what had been reported by the foreign experts.
> Very well, they responded immediately, tell us how to do the study. So, for
> the next two days, we demonstrated to them how to draw transects and conduct
> animal counts, how to document the diversity of grasses and shrubs, and how
> to systematically record their observations.As soon as the snows melted,
> six of them headed towards the alpine meadows, following the same route that
> the scientists had taken ten years earlier. Two porters who had been taken
> along to ferry the supplies to base camp (at heights of over 3000 metres,
> one does not run into the occasional tea shop or restaurant!), became so
> familiar with the routines of measurement that they eventually became part
> of the study team. Six weeks later they returned, armed with a range of
> documented observations. A detailed examination of their records showed that
> they had successfully challenged every one of the findings of the
> government-sponsored study. In addition, their measurements indicated what
> was the carrying capacity of the meadows, how ruminants were in fact
> controlling weed infestation, and how the herbs could be harvested within
> the boundaries of conservation.
>
> This much, then, is certain: people fight their struggles for survival
> based on what knowledge they can create. Each one of the reports and studies
> cited above (and numerous others that have not been documented in both rural
> and urban areas) indicates that ordinary working people have the capacity to
> learn, to collect information, to look at it analytically, and eventually
> use it for bettering their own lives. This is, or should be, the central
> objective of "education". And yet, these are simple (and yet very complex)
> tasks that are not undertaken by our educational institutions. Didactic
> instruction, memorising by rote, and vomiting out useless information for
> futile examinations constitute the fundamentals of what passes for education
> in our schools and colleges. Perhaps there is a purpose to it all. Perhaps
> another Macaulay is required to explain it to us in yet another Minute. And
> perhaps, in some not too distant future, a group of young labourers will
> learn to document their own lives to tear this farce to pieces.
> ------------------------------
> *A graduate (and post-graduate) from IIT Bombay, Dunu Roy heads Hazard
> Centre in New Delhi.*
>
>
> ------------------------------
> # You may be missing other accompanying blurbs, related stories,
> graphics etc.
> Link to this story as it appears on the site :- *Knowledge As
Weapon<http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20070621&fname=dunuroy&sid=1>
> *
> www.outlookindia.com
> ------------------------------
>
> *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "203.200.89.96"
> claiming to be *Subscribe Online: Outlook
Magazine<http://203.200.89.96/sfa/newsuboutlook.asp>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
Umesh Sharma
Washington D.C.
1-202-215-4328 [Cell]
Ed.M. - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of 2005
http://www.uknow.gse.harvard.edu/index.html (Edu info)
http://hbswk.hbs.edu/ (Management Info)
www.gse.harvard.edu/iep (where the above 2 are used )
http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/
------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign up
for your free account
today<http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html>
.
