At 1:16 AM +0530 10/12/07, Nayanjyoti Medhi wrote:
C Da,
I am really Sorry but you have found a place in my ignore list.
**** It does not surprise me. I also know why ,
as do most other who can read. I am sure it does
not help your feeling of well being when I keep
reminding you of the answers you owe us. But I
will desist and let you rest. I don't like to
see my Kharkhowa brethren, even those who are
sick and tired of me, suffer so.
And for your personal satisfaction, as i have my
stand clear earlier, I am sick of you and the
Government. I find absolutely no difference
between the two. Both have done absolutely
nothing for the masses (people of Assam)
**** Ouch! That hurts, being put in the same
bracket as the govt. But I appreciate the 'fair
and balanced' attitude. Only difference is that
I don't control your lives, while your govt.
does. And what are you doing about that? Or
all the others in your shoes doing for that
matter? Do you think YOU are contributing
anything to the solution ?
and both of you win if the problem does not get solved.
**** Solutions do not fall from the sky, nor do
they result from wishful thinking or from
performing umpteen pujas , even at Kamakhya.
Either they will come from your dedicated efforts
or will be delivered by others applying such
diligent efforts. It is your choice to pay your
fair share or remain a parasite of society
feeding on others' efforts. I hope you know
where you fit in.
Good bye and good health.
c-da
Regards,
Nayan
On 10/11/07, Chan Mahanta
<<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>would it not be even better if you move a step
ahead and include the masses of Assam alongwith
the >Assamnetters in a meaningful discussion
regarding the necessity of a National Liberation
Struggle of >Asom
**** Would Nayanjyoti lead or support a
movement in Assam to allow an unfettered and
free discussion and debate on the subject of WHY
Assam's sovereignty, without governmental
intimidation or private sabotage ?
I will be pleased to fire the first salvo by
offering my series on the subject. I will even
edit it from the conversational format to an
article format.
>Also you need to convince us and the masses as
to why you are better than the government and
why >the masses should support you.
**** At the same time, would Nayanjyoti and
others like him also tell us why Indian rule isd
better for Assam and how it has served Assam's
welfare since the birth of ULFA?
>By the way the font used in the reply to Shri
Shantikam Hazarika is Times New Roman while
the >Signature is in Courier New. Whoever
drafted your reply did a good job.
**** Is that illegal by Indian law, or is it
unethical or immoral or otherwise unbecoming?
cm
At 4:31 PM +0530 10/11/07, Nayanjyoti Medhi wrote:
I am in receipt of a cc of your reply to Mt
Shantikam Hazarika. maybe wrongly included due
to mistaken identity. I see reference to Nayan
Parasar in the reply so maybe you have thought
me to be him which is not correct. But anyways
I would not want to deprive myself of this
opportunity of talking directly with you.
It is good to know that you are open to debates
and discussion, but I would like to suggest that
since you have indicated in most clear words
that you are open to queries and discussions,
would it not be even better if you move a step
ahead and include the masses of Assam alongwith
the Assamnetters in a meaningful discussion
regarding the necessity of a National Liberation
Struggle of Asom as the persons indulging in a
dialogue over the issue in assamnet are a mere
handful and do not amount to a majority of the
Assamese masses. I am sure since as per your own
admission, the modern communications have made
the world a small place, you will have no
difficulty in engaging in dialogue with the
masses.
But then there is one more thing i would like to
bring to your notice. We all are aware of the
aim of the ULFA in the past Twenty Eight years
of struggle. But then, we also are aware to this
fact that times have changed. So, the onus is on
you to convince us and the masses if the same
conditions prevails now and are relevant which
were there 28 years back. I would be glad to
know as I was only about 4 months old when the
liberation struggle started.
After all as you proclaim, you are struggling on
behalf of the masses of Assam, it becomes your
foremost duty and obligation to secure for the
masses what the government could not. i.e.,
peace and prosperity etc., Also you need to
convince us and the masses as to why you are
better than the government and why the masses
should support you.
Regards,
Nayanjyoti Medhi
P.S: By the way the font used in the reply to
Shri Shantikam Hazarika is Times New Roman while
the Signature is in Courier New. Whoever drafted
your reply did a good job.
On 10/11/07, ulfa_ 1979April7
<<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Mr Shantikam Hazarika,
Your relevant mail has proven that, your real
intention is to destroy the National Liberation
Struggle of Asom by attacking Ruby Bhuyan of the
ULFA like a rabid dog biting people on the
street indiscriminately. We thank you for
revealing your design.
We do not wish to insult you by trying to make
you knowledgeable how the modern communications
have made the world a small place. However, we
are at a loss to make out why are you unaware of
the aim of the ULFA¢s past Twenty-Eight years of
struggle in Asom? Excepting a yokel, a person
like you well versed in advanced technology,
should not have to come up with such a view.
The debate in question was not put forward in a
manner of your requirement of ¡asked them in
plain, straight forward English¢. You are trying
to throw blows in the air just to sweep this
deficiency under the carpet. We would like to
remind you that the debate took place as a
result of Nayan Parasar criticizing
impertinently in the Asom On Line forum ¡the get
well wish¢ statement of our Honourable Chairman
Arobinda Rajkhowa when Dr. Mamoni Goswami fell
ill. Criticism of a ¡Get well wish¢ cannot be
¡Honest,gentle, civilized¢. But you approving
his subterfuge and attacking the ULFA with
vindictive words have been noted in the net.
You may not be aware that about ten years ago
Prof. Jugal Kalita linking the ULFA website to
the Assam Org site there was an objection raised
by one Supratik Gupta. Following this there was
a long debate between Arun Mahanta, a member of
the ULFA¢s Central Publicity Group and Supratik
Gupta. In this debate, Supratik was given
detailed replies with unambiguous views the ULFA
holds. Supratik Gupta was not satisfied with it,
but, the ULFA was very frank in giving out
replies. He wished to know what his status would
be in a Sovereign Independent Assam to a person
of Bangladesh origin. We must say that Supratik
Gupta behaved like a gentleman. On the other
hand your good man Nayan Parasar does not sound
at all a gentleman, but a sycophant bent upon
keeping Asom under colonial occupation forever.
We are analysing of the reasons why should you
be promoting the sycophancy of Parasar as
something very honourable.
If you really want a useful discussion, you are
welcome to come forward in earnest. Do you think
only your type are the ones who deserves
respect? You do not have to instigate any one to
have a debate with us. In this instant what has
unfolded puts you in the same defiled platform
as with Nayan Parasr and Utpal Borpujari.
Otherwise we could have a meaningful dignified
debate in the meantime. Instead of scornfulness
and insulting, a simple request on the query
would have an appropriate approach. Now, in
trying to prove the mastery of English or lack
of it, has pushed aside our willing to be
engaged in a meaningful discussion from the
original debate. There is saying, ¡Faith is all
about belief and destructive criticism shakes
such beliefs¢ and a similar response by
yourselves has ruined the possibility of
productive engagement in this instance. Why are
you all trying to damage the Mahanta brothers
now?
Rubi bhuyan
central publicity member,ulfa
Are you a hoarder? Then you'll love
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mailuk/taglines/hotmail/hoarder/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48524/*http://uk.mail.yahoo.com>Yahoo!
Mail with unlimited storage.
--
Nayanjyoti Medhi
Advocate
Gauhati High Court
Chamber:
Satya Bora Lane, Dighalipukhuri East
Guwahati-781001, Assam
Phone:
+91 361 2416960
+91 94350 43007
Email:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Nayanjyoti Medhi
Advocate
Gauhati High Court
Chamber:
Satya Bora Lane, Dighalipukhuri East
Guwahati-781001, Assam
Phone:
+91 361 2416960
+91 94350 43007
Email:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
