>assam@assamnet.org my be held accountable for facilitating it as well
*** Yeah? Why? *** Any number of Assam newspapers publish those and 'facilitate' their dissemination among the public as well, don't they? How is it then assamnet should be held responsible and for WHAT? Because a Kolkata rag says so? Or because one of its devotees does? *** Those who don't like to see or read an ULFA news release can either not open it or delete it. What right do they have to deprive others form seeing them? Or are we attempting to promote the idea of freedom of only those pieces of info we like to see and not what gives us heart-burn? At 9:59 AM -0500 3/3/08, Ram Dhar wrote: >pls read >http://www.telegraphindia.com/1080303/jsp/northeast/story_8972344.jsp >forum moderators may read this , 100s of us receive the same >e-mail content coz we are subscribed to this forum.... >[EMAIL PROTECTED] my be held accountable for facilitating >it as well ............... > > ..I could be wrong... I am all for free speech et al but just >wondering how this scenario stands ......just a thought........ > > > > > >_________________________________________________________________ >Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser! >http://biggestloser.msn.com/ >_______________________________________________ >assam mailing list >assam@assamnet.org >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org _______________________________________________ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
