If their religion is supreme why isn't the muslim world the shining beacon
of
progress
prosperity
development in scientific fields
equality
......
JS




On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Jyotirmoy Sharma <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Calling a spade a spade does not make me a Muslim hater or a Hindu fanatic.
> I am neither.
> But if they continue with their acts of terrorism in the name of their
> religion, then there is something wrong. It is better to question that,
> rather than deny the problem. And that has to be addressed by the educated
> in their faith.
> It is creating a problem for those of their faith who like us just want to
> lead a normal live. If they chose to ignore, then all of their community
> members get tagged. That is what is happening in Aus too. Because of the
> actions of a few Lebanese crooks and an attention seeking imam, people are
> questioning whether followers of their religion can assimilate with any
> other culture. It's best to say that relations between the Christian Aussies
> and muslims are not very friendly. There was a big racial riot in Sydney not
> too long too ago ( The sequence of events being: Lebanese youths taunt and
> pass remarks against white Aus women going to the beach in their beachwear,
> they gang up and beat up an Aussie life saver; Aussies have enough of the
> nonsense. One Sat, they gather in the beach in thousands and beat up any
> middle eastern looking people )
>
> Why does this happen everywhere? Is it wrong to question? Is it ok to wage
> a war against "kafirs" and non-believers of their faith?
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi J:
>>
>>
>> At 8:14 PM +0800 5/17/08, Jyotirmoy Sharma wrote:
>> >Hi C'da
>> >I was thinking that since you have rubbished my ideas, you might have
>> better
>> >ones. So I gave you options to make your task easier.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> **** One does NOT have to have better ideas to be able to scrutinize
>> those that are being offered.
>> Should society's able people sit idly by just because they don't have
>> a better solution to NOT oppose what is patently bad ?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >  >Yeah better living conditions and equality did not stop the 911
>> attacks,
>> >Madrid bombings, the London underground bombings. You fail to understand
>> >that these fundamentalist never adopt the country that have given them
>> >refuge from their warn torn homeland. It is only recently that the
>> western
>> >  >countries are coming to face with what India has been facing
>> forgenerations.
>>
>>
>>
>> **** My response was to the question  below:
>>
>> >  > >Do you know why western nations( US, UK, Canada, Australia and
>> likewise )
>> >  >are relatively safe... That's because they take terrorism seriously.
>>
>>
>> Can the assertion made in the question -- and the comment above "Yeah
>> better living conditions and equality did not stop the 911 attacks"
>> stand  in the same context?
>>
>> What they point to is a  flawed, confused  thought process, an
>> inability to analyze things critically. Question would be why?
>>
>>
>>
>> >  >As for Dr Hanneef case it wasn't an entirely failed operation. As a
>> fallout
>> >of the efforts, it was found that some jihadi elements were planning to
>> >strike Melbourne during a AFL final game. All have been arrested and are
>> now
>> languishing behind bars. This is what I meant by proactive actions.
>>
>>
>> **** So was Dr. Haneef. He too languished behind bars and was already
>> punished, even though he was not guilty of anything. Just because
>> some others were too arrested and are "--languishing behind bars"
>> proves NOTHING . What if they too are found to be not guilty? Then
>> what? Would that advance Australia's security or would it further
>> damage it?
>>
>>
>> I dwell on the point for a very simple but critically important
>> reason:  When governments PUNISH people  ( as by arresting and
>> holding without trial for years on end) even when not guilty--or
>> disproportionately to the crime committed, it does NOT advance
>> society's safety--it merely worsens it.  Assam is a terrific lesson
>> in point. As is Kashmir. And all acrooss the length and breadth of
>> the South Asian sub-continent.
>>
>>
>> At the root of this phenomenon lies a dysfunctional state. The
>> INSTITUTIONS OF STATE that are entrusted with it, must be thoroughly
>> reformed, re-tooled and made functional to provide DETERRENCE to
>> wrong-doers while protecting the well-being of society.
>>
>> But Indians have no concept of it, by and large, because generations
>> of Indians have not seen any worthwhile example of it. And when they
>> see it , often they cannot comprehend it.   A good example is of
>> The Kashmiri JNU prof--I forget the name, whose faulty death sentence
>> was overturned by the Indian SC, unleashing a floodgate of anger and
>> protests from the blood-thirsty lot, who assumed the man was guilty,
>> just because he is a Kashmiri Muslim.
>>
>> Here lies the the need for EDUCATING the nation on what constitutes
>> democracy and democratic values.  Such education does not come
>> imprinted on the genes. It has to be taught, the values inculcated.
>> That MINORITIES, be it numerical or be it coded--as in Muslims, are
>> NOT automatically , guilty, or are terrorists, as you imply in these
>> posts.  It points to your own hang-ups and prejudices and yours or
>> other Hindu jealots'  outbursts do not make your people any safer. It
>> merely makes matters worse. For everybody.
>>
>>
>>
>> >  > So, will it change? Yes, it can, if people put pressure on the
>> >Govt. People can topple governments if they don't act.
>>
>>
>> **** They keep doing it almost every four ( or is it five?)  years in
>> India. But show me WHAT has changed. I ask, because I want you to
>> think. And if you do, instead of mouthing off your prejudices and
>> fears every time,  you just might find some USEFUL answers. But if
>> you don't, no problem. There are others who have. We learn from each
>> other.  Pay attention and learn to open your mind. It will do you
>> good.
>>
>> Best.
>>
>> cm
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> >**** Really?  Well, I learn something everyday! Until now, I thought
>> >it was because these societies do not have the conditions and the
>> >social conflicts that have given rise to the kind of violence India
>> >is reaping, and because their conflict resolution apparatus of
>> >governance are functional, by and large.
>> >
>> >Yeah better living conditions and equality did not stop the 911 attacks,
>> >Madrid bombings, the London underground bombings. You fail to understand
>> >that these fundamentalist never adopt the country that have given them
>> >refuge from their warn torn homeland. It is only recently that the
>> western
>> >countries are coming to face with what India has been facing for
>> >generations.
>> >
>> >
>> >**** So why DOES India sit back and do NOTHING ? What seems to be the
>> >problem?
>> >Corruption and power hungry politicians who do no think beyond retaining
>> >their seats. For seeking power they would even settle the illegals in the
>> >homeland and seek votes from them. Assam being a prime example.
>> >
>> >As for Dr Hanneef case it wasn't an entirely failed operation. As a
>> fallout
>> >of the efforts, it was found that some jihadi elements were planning to
>> >strike Melbourne during a AFL final game. All have been arrested and are
>> now
>> >languishing behind bars. This is what I meant by proactive actions. They
>> did
>> >not wait for a stadium to be bombed and then look for clues.
>> >
>> >Mr Mahanta ..if your house is attacked by pests, you would probably clean
>> up
>> >the house and then put a pest barrier(insecticides, etc ) around your
>> house.
>> >That would not rid your house of pests but it will stop them from
>> entering
>> >your house, won't it? India is surrounded by two hostile neighbours who
>> >obviously can't match India.  If you are sure that these rogue elements
>> are
>> >coming from across the border, and the other country is not doing
>> anything
>> >to prevent these groups from attacking India, do you have too many other
>> >options?
>> >
>> >Why India hasn't done so? The word is minority appeasement. I think you
>> can
>> >pretty much guess whom the term "minority" means in India. I leave that
>> for
>> >you to guess. So, will it change? Yes, it can, if people put pressure on
>> the
>> >Govt. People can topple governments if they don't act.
>> >
>> >
>> >JS
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >>  At 9:36 PM +0800 5/16/08, Jyotirmoy Sharma wrote:
>> >>  >Ok... my ideas and suggestions are bad, do you have better ones:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  **** I was not the one who made those recommendations .
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  >Are you suggesting that
>> >>  >a) India do nothing
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  **** Is that something I said or implied?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  >b) Continue allowing more illegals into the country so that they can
>> cause
>> >>  >more trouble.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  **** Did I suggest any such thing?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  I merely asked questions about  the recommendations made.  The
>> >>  answers speak for themselves.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  >
>> >  > >Do you know why western nations( US, UK, Canada, Australia and
>> likewise )
>> >  > >are relatively safe... That's because they take terrorism seriously.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  **** Really?  Well, I learn something everyday! Until now, I thought
>> >  > it was because these societies do not have the conditions and the
>> >>  social conflicts that have given rise to the kind of violence India
>> >>  is reaping, and because their conflict resolution apparatus of
>> >>  governance are functional, by and large.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  >Do you
>> >>  >think any of these country will sit back if a city was hit with 7
>> bombs?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  **** So why DOES India sit back and do NOTHING ? What seems to be the
>> >>  problem?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  >They do not go for minority appeasement and deal with terrorists and
>> >>  >terrorism with a strong hand.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  **** Should I read here that 'minorities' and 'terrorists' are
>> >>  synonymous, or is it just this 'damned English language' problem
>> >>  again ?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  >Remember the Dr Haneef case in Aus. The Aus
>> >>  >agencies did not wait for a terrorist activity to happen in it's soil
>> >>  first
>> >>  >and then react. They took preemptive actions, although in this regard
>> it
>> >>  >turned out to be wrong.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  **** Tsk! What a bummer!! One powerful example, except it turned out
>> >>  to be grossly faulty. Didn't the Australian Supreme Court order the
>> >  > govt. to allow Dr. Haneef to return or some such thing?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  That brings up the question again: Should India emulate what does not
>> work?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  >
>> >>  >As for not doing anything, the results are there to see: bomb blasts
>> one
>> >>  >after the other.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  **** Once again I ask: WHY does India do NOTHING? What seems to be
>> >>  the problem? Is it because of a fear that Big Brother might not
>> >>  approve of ? What?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  >Demographic change across villages and towns . These
>> >>  >illegals then become prime candidates for jehadis. Assam becoming the
>> >>  worst
>> >>  >sufferer.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  **** I didn't realize that Assam is the worst victim of  'Jehadi
>> >>  bombing'. What did I miss?  Where did that happen in recent times?
>> >>  And were the 'illegals' the perpetrators? And if they were,  who
>> >>  proved it so, and what happened to the perpetrators?
>> >>
>> >>  I am dying to learn. Seriously!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  >Mahatma Gandhi's principle of offering the other cheek also when
>> slapped
>> >>  on
>> >>  >the other are long gone.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  **** Thanks for educating me. I am not very well informed on these
>> >>  nuances of recent history.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  >If you get hit, you have to hit back with twice the
>> >>  >force.
>> >>  >JS
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  **** Thanks again for sharing the wise notion.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  Not so sincerely yours,
>> >>
>> >>  cm
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  >
>> >>  >
>> >>  >
>> >>  >
>> >>  >On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >>  wrote:
>> >>  >
>> >>  >>  At 7:50 PM +0800 5/15/08, Jyotirmoy Sharma wrote:
>> >>  >>  >Yes...catch the culprits!!
>> >>  >>  >If found to be handiwork of Indians, I don't see a point of
>> wasting
>> >>  space
>> >>  >>  in
>> >>  >>  >jails.
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  *** Words of the wise!
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  Question is WHO will do the CATCHING and dispensing of the implied
>> >>  >>  SUMMARY justice?
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  Time to bring the Indian Army, experienced in delivering such
>> >>  >>  justice,  back from Assam, Manipur, Nagaland, Kashmir and
>> unleashing
>> >>  >>  in Rajasthan, Mumbai, Dilli and UP perhaps ?
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >If found to be handiwork of "foreign" power, warn the countries
>> >>  involved
>> >>  >>  to
>> >>  >>  >hand over terrorists or groups involved within a timeframe.
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  **** That would be NEW?
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  And they would be TERRIFIED by desi-warnings? I can almost hear
>> >>  >>  Pakistani knees rattling!!
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >If not met,
>> >>  >>  >launch military strikes inside their terrorist camps( be it POK
>> or
>> >>  >>  >Bangladesh or elsewhere ).
>> >>  >  >
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  **** Assuming THAT is the answer, what has been holding India
>> back?
>> >>  >>  And if India could not do it all these years, HOW will that change
>> >>  >>  tomorrow? Or WHY?
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >If world condemns, issue statements like "it's a fight against
>> >>  terrorism
>> >>  >>  and
>> >>  >>  >either you are with us or with the terrorists."
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  **** That is an astute advice no doubt.  Only question is if it
>> has
>> >>  >>  brought any results for those who used the argument?
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  When we copy something, should we not be competent enough to be
>> able
>> >>  >>  to copy something that BRINGS results, as opposed to copying dumb
>> >  > >>  ideas?
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >After all US, Israel, Russia, China  do the same.
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  ***Hmmm!  Again the question is IF they are good examples of
>> having
>> >>  >>  rid themselves of the scourge ?
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >India have to stop
>> >>  >>  >adopting a soft approach to terrorist attacks.
>> >>  >>  >plus
>> >>  >>  >send all illegal immigrants back to where they came from.
>> >>  >>  >JS
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  **** Somehow the words ring utterly hollow and devoid of ordinary
>> >>  reason.
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >
>> >>  >>  >
>> >>  >>  >
>> >>  >>  >On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Chan Mahanta <
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>  >>  wrote:
>> >>  >>  >
>> >>  >>  >>  Any suggestions on how to solve the problem?
>> >>  >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >>  At 9:01 PM +0800 5/14/08, Jyotirmoy Sharma wrote:
>> >>  >>  >>  >Bombay,  Hyderabad, Jaipur, ... the list will go on.
>> >>  >>  >>  >Our spineless govt. has as usual blamed a "foreign" power.
>> Like
>> >>  all
>> >  > >>  other
>> >>  >>  >>  >cases earlier, this will be in the news for a few days and
>> will
>> >>  soon
>> >>  >>  be
>> >>  >>  >>  >forgotten.
>> >>  >>  >>  >We keep buying weapons, spending billions buying jets,
>> aircraft
>> >>  >>  carriers,
>> >>  >>  >>  >testing missiles, ICBM's for what purpose?
>> >>  >>  >>  >JS
>> >>  >>  >>  >_______________________________________________
>> >>  >>  >>  >assam mailing list
>> >>  >>  >>  >[email protected]
>> >>  >>  >>  >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>> >>  >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >>  _______________________________________________
>> >>  >>  >>  assam mailing list
>> >>  >>  >>  [email protected]
>> >>  >>  >>  http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>> >>  >>  >>
>> >>  >>  >_______________________________________________
>> >>  >>  >assam mailing list
>> >>  >>  >[email protected]
>> >>  >>  >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >>  _______________________________________________
>> >>  >>  assam mailing list
>> >>  >>  [email protected]
>> >>  >>  http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>> >>  >>
>> >>  >_______________________________________________
>> >>  >assam mailing list
>> >>  >[email protected]
>> >>  >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  _______________________________________________
>> >>  assam mailing list
>> >>  [email protected]
>> >>  http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>> >>
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >assam mailing list
>> >[email protected]
>> >http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> assam mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to