Glad you caught on to the main idea A.  

See I am not nearly as radical as people like to paint me as . I do believe in 
being rational :-).

BTW, there is a whole lot more to this scheme than meets the eye. I will expose 
more of it shortly. Stay tuned.

c-da






On Nov 3, 2012, at 10:33 AM, "Alpana B. Sarangapani" 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> That is a great detailed description, C-da. Thank you!
> 
> And it does look scary. How can a natural process be totally stopped and all 
> the waters be stored into those dams  It will be like cleaning the Augean 
> Stables. 
> 
> Also, even if it is done, if/when the embankments give way then the water 
> will be uncontrollable. This would be worse than the Riverlinking idea. I 
> don't see a solution there now. : (
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Nov 2, 2012, at 10:26 PM, "Chan Mahanta" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> A:
>> 
>> It is NOT so much about building dams as embankments. The  idea proposed by 
>> Major Chandra is entirely based on building
>> hundreds of miles of mega-embankments, on both sides of the Brahmaputra. He 
>> would create monster canals, impoundments,  he calls Sagars,
>> both sides of the Brahmaputra, ostensibly to prevent the tributaries from 
>> flooding the main river and its flood plains, which really is  most of the 
>> Brahmaputra valley. His embankments are proposed to be 20 meters ( 66 ft) in 
>> height.
>> 
>> If we draw a cross section of a 66' tall embankment with a 20 meter ( again 
>> 66') top, it will be like a mesa that is 66' wide at the top and 330 ft. 
>> wide ( 110 yds) 
>> at the base at the very least ( with a 1:2 slope, which is much too 
>> steep-ideally it should be 1:3).  These will run from the western to the 
>> eastern end of the Brahmaputra valley, two of them to the north and two to 
>> the south. I call them the Mother of All Embankments. 
>> 
>> Now compare these embankments to the new highway that has been under 
>> construction four at least the past  5 years, from near Jagiroad to near 
>> Na-Gaon. I am not sure if it is done, YET! Did you see the environmental 
>> catastrophe this project created? And it was barely 3 meters tall and 
>> perhaps no more than 15 meters wide at the top. The Chandra Sagar project 
>> will be a hundred folds larger, if not more. Oh, one more thing: Chandra 
>> knows he will have to build an impervious core to these embankments. 
>> Impervious core will be concrete. I am no civil engineer, but an educated 
>> guess will be that this impervious core, 66' tall will be at least 10' 
>> thick. Can you imagine the volume of concrete he will need to build these - 
>> nearly 500 mile long for each embankment, multiplied by two for the north 
>> and an equally long , nearly a thousand miles, for the south AT THE VERY 
>> LEAST. I say at the very least, because we have not considered the lengths 
>> of these embankments both sides of the tributaries also that the scheme will 
>> require as well.
>> 
>> All these are in the realm of the possible. But at a cost. And what might 
>> the costs be?
>> 
>> A: First we should look at WHY the Brahmaputra and the tributaries flood so 
>> much. A very short and simple answer is that the rivers have become very 
>> shallow
>> from silting. So to be able to carry they volume of water they need to 
>> expand, widen, causing flooding. The PRIMARY cause of the worsening flooding 
>> is SILTING of the rivers.
>> 
>> So, why are these rivers getting silted? Where is the silt coming from? A 
>> simple answer is that it comers from Arunachal to the north and from the 
>> other hIll areas from the south. 
>> 
>> WHY you may ask. Again to put it simply, because of unrelenting 
>> deforestation and land disturbance ( earthmoving)  in these hilly areas. The 
>> population there are building roads, settlements, farming more and so forth.
>> 
>> Now then, what do you think will Chandra's embankment building  do to the 
>> silting problem of these rivers? Simply put, it will exacerbate the silting 
>> problem by several hundred folds, not to mention the dust and other 
>> pollution that will be the norm all over Assam for decades to come.
>> 
>> Not that Chandra does not know of the silting problem. He does. And he tells 
>> us that the tributaries will have to be  fitted with dams to prevent the 
>> silt from getting into the
>> Brahmaputra and that they will have to be DREDGED!
>> 
>> Wait just a minute! Dredging did he say? I heard it is NOT possible. 
>> Apparently Indian and Kharkhowa experts have decided that dredging is not 
>> feasible since there is no place to deposit the dredged silt.  I am sure you 
>> heard it too, right here in Assamnet.
>> 
>> WHAT GIVES? Does it NOT sound fishy to you? IF Chandra Sagars are contingent 
>> on de-silting of the tributaries, why not start doing that to the MOTHER 
>> river, the Brahmaputra, to begin with? That will obviate the need for 
>> building the Chandra Sagars with the mother-of all embankments, which will 
>> uproot thousands of natives from the valley and render vast areas of fertile 
>> arable land permanently inundated and keep it under water year round.
>> 
>> But that is NOT ALL. There is much more to it that I will point out, should 
>> it be difficult for you and others to imagine!
>> 
>> Chandra Sagars are borne out of a far more insidious and unspoken motive. 
>> Guess what?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Nov 2, 2012, at 9:19 PM, Alpana B. Sarangapani 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> If you did not like the RiverLinks project how would you like this project 
>>> which talks about building dams? 
>>> 
>>> Taking care of the flood problem which washes away all hopes for the 
>>> villagers/farmers every year, was the main reason that made me fall for it, 
>>> like many would!
>>> 
>>> I won't deserve any praises since it isn't my project or anything, just was 
>>> not ready for the Guwal-gaali'. : ) 
>>> 
>>> Did not want to make mm-da mad either, as he also 'naakos kori disil 
>>> prothomotei' when he brought it up yesterday. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Nov 2, 2012, at 2:17 PM, "Chan Mahanta" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Aw come on A! Nobody is gonna bite you. What are you afraid of? Being 
>>>> right or wrong ?
>>>> 
>>>> *I* promise NOT to make any snide  or sarcastic comments if you are wrong. 
>>>> Instead I will try to explain why you may be wrong.
>>>> On the other hand, if you make the right assessment, we will shower you 
>>>> with praise.  Wouldn't that be nice?
>>>> 
>>>> So, go ahead and do share your thoughts. We will all be the richer for it. 
>>>> Personally, I learn something everyday. Who knows, you 
>>>> may open my close mind!
>>>> 
>>>> :-)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Nov 2, 2012, at 2:04 PM, "Alpana B. Sarangapani" 
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Yes, i saw that and read some of it. Thanks to Babul.
>>>>> 
>>>>> To be honest, I am just too afraid to comment now.  : )
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Nov 2, 2012, at 9:13 AM, "Chan Mahanta" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> So, Alpana, Babul has provided ALL the written material of the Oxom 
>>>>>> Xaagor scheme. The proposal describes all the benefits the scheme
>>>>>> is expected to generate. The big idea is to block the tributaries from 
>>>>>> contributing flood water to the Brahmaputra.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But that is not all!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Major Chandra has also put together an exactly similar scheme to block 
>>>>>> ALL of the tributaries to the Ganga in Bihar as well, creating Bihar 
>>>>>> Sagars.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Note also the one line item: 
>>>>>> 12. *NO INVOLVEMENT OF *any other state.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am sure you know why it is such a stand-out bit of info. He knows 
>>>>>> Assam's sensitivity about her waters being spirited away.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> How can one go wrong, right?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ** Think about it, and see if there could be problems with the scheme. 
>>>>>> And if so what?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> c-da
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:57 PM, "Alpana B. Sarangapani" 
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thul-mulkoi - in text version, can it be explained, what is this Oxom 
>>>>>>> -Xaagor that  Mukul-da and now you are talking about, C-da?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Nov 1, 2012, at 5:07 PM, "Chan Mahanta" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hello Assamnetters,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Long time no talk. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Decided to return to the ol' 'juhalor mel' by announcing my latest 
>>>>>>>> blog site. I hope this one will last a bit longer than the previous 
>>>>>>>> attempts.
>>>>>>>> Posted a picture to:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> http://chanmanstl.tumblr.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It is from my recent 10 day rafting/ camping  trip down the Colorado 
>>>>>>>> River deep in the bottom of the Grand Canyon. It was an awesome  trip.
>>>>>>>> I hope to share some images and hopefully with a little description in 
>>>>>>>> the coming weeks and months. It is a departure from my usual
>>>>>>>> fare in assamnet. But this may be more palatable than the never ending 
>>>>>>>> debates of the past :-).
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Speaking of which, mm's note of this morning referring to Oxom Xagor 
>>>>>>>> is something that got me going a few days back. It is yet another 
>>>>>>>> one of those hare-brained proposals that ought to be nipped in the 
>>>>>>>> bud. I thought of posting it here, but since it requires graphic 
>>>>>>>> attachment, probably won't go thru this list. Maybe I will be able to 
>>>>>>>> post it thru some other forum. We will see.  The author also prohibits 
>>>>>>>> publishing it without  permission. I can imagine why :-). 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> cm
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> assam mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> assam mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> assam mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> assam mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
> _______________________________________________
> assam mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org


_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to