Some times ago I did sample some pages of the book at random, may be I
can add my critics later.

But since Shantikam Hazarika hinted my questions through his writing,
"Sometime we also try to 'intellectualise' the problem, as we see in the
net people asking questions about "Bangla birth rate" etc." -
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/assamonline/message/2771
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/assamonline/message/2771>
I am writing to tell the difference between critical and intellectual.

Sometimes questions are the easy way to learn quickly so I ask
questions!

All my questions in link
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/assamonline/message/2721
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/assamonline/message/2721>
are critical questions, because correct answers may lead critical-turn
to what Sanjoy Hazarika wrote about Birth Rates (of Bangladesh, India,
Sri Lanka and Indian states including Nagalend).

While a problem may be critical but cannot turn intellectual!
Problem is a problem that may harm if worst.

But if one can highlight an art/method to solve a problem then the
art/method may be called an intellectual art/method.

One who can highlight such art/method may be called an Intellectual.

I have asked the question, "What is the Birth Rate of Nagaland?"

Because population growth may not always be tied up to Birth Rate, and
Naga race is a rare bran of Mongoloid - not highly fertile due to the
biogenetic recipes in their body.

So if Sanjoy Hazarika does not make his source directly available and I
too do not explore to find an answerer then I do not have a way to learn
what causes the high population growth in Nagaland.

In my view, Shantikam should explore what is "Library Research", as
because this will tell more on questions critical-questions etc
including intellectual development.

As I wrote before, it is observed to be just opposite of what Sanjoy
Hazarika wrote about Bangladesh India and Sri Lanka CBRs (CBR - Crude
Birth Rate).

In order to understand the discrepancies I need to know the source where
he got the information - hoping the source is not his published book.

Regards,
Rabin
Crude Birth Rate (CBR) of Bangladesh:
for CBR 1911-91
http://banglapedia.search.com.bd/HT/F_0061.htm
<http://banglapedia.search.com.bd/HT/F_0061.htm>
source BBS - Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics
BSS study sponsored by United States Agency for International
Development
for CBR 2000-2005
http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=bg&v=25
<http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=bg&v=25>
Source: CIA World Factbook (CIA source : BSS)

Crude Birth Rate (CBR) of India:
CBR 1971-2000
http://www.censusindia.net/results/eci13_page1.html
<http://www.censusindia.net/results/eci13_page1.html>
CBR 2003
http://demotemp257.nic.in/httpdoc/vital_statistics/Vital_Rates/Vital_rat\
es.html
<http://demotemp257.nic.in/httpdoc/vital_statistics/Vital_Rates/Vital_ra\
tes.html>
for CBR 2000-2005
http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=in&v=25
<http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=in&v=25>
(Source: CIA World Factbook)

Crude Birth Rate (CBR) of Sri Lanka:
CBR 1936-2001
http://www.statistics.gov.lk/population/tables.pdf
<http://www.statistics.gov.lk/population/tables.pdf>
(Department of Census and Statistics Sri Lanka)
for CBR 2000-2005
http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=ce&v=25
<http://www.indexmundi.com/g/g.aspx?c=ce&v=25>
(ource: CIA World Factbook)

World Countries' CBR:
https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/rankorder/2054rank.html
<https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/rankorder/2054rank.html>
(CIA records - Niger has the highest CBR and Hong Kong lowest)


Reply via email to