<<I mis-posted to IBM-Main, so am now posting to assembler-list. Sorry for the duplication for those who follow both>>
>So the macro prolog has no bearing on the PI status, but you are >showing us some prolog text to demonstrate that a feature is not >PI...? Should I take it from this that a prospective user of any >service needs to check both the macro and the book and use the most >restrictive interpretation? The information was placed into the prolog to help answer questions just like Ed's. I contend that it does. Also, for data areas, the book is generated automatically from the macro (including prolog). The one thing that is missing in the prolog is the explicit statement on Use2Gto32G that this keyword is intended for IBM use only. Perhaps that will be added when we get around to it. GUPI and PSPI: now PI. DMTI (Diagnostic, Modification, Tuning information): now notPI Our intent is to provide migration and change information if anything GUPI / PSPI / PI changes incompatibly. We fail to meet that intent every now and then (maybe too many now's and too many then's) but we're trying to improve. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design
