On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Fred van der Windt <fred.van.der.wi...@mail.ing.nl> wrote:
> Which means it is unforunate that Angel isn't able to post the code. > Something must be awfully wrong with the assembler code if it is twice as > slow as the Enterprise COBOL code... Guess it is possible that the assembler code implemented a (slightly) different algorithm than what was written in COBOL. | Rob
