Original posting refers to CSF calls for encryption (processing); such calls generally involve the use of a separate encryption hardware engine/feature which generally has multiple parallel processing capabilities that maybe the COBOL code is taking advantage of. Another possibility is the ASM version is requesting the key more than necessary (resides within a system file accessed by ICSF) â try nullifying the CSF calls and then see which uses the least CPU.
- Re: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPR... Bernd Oppolzer
- Re: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPR... Kirk Wolf
- Re: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPR... Farley, Peter x23353
- Re: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPR... Dougie Lawson
- Re: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPRISE COBOL Bill Fairchild
- Re: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPRISE COBOL Angel Luis DomÃnguez
- Re: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPRISE COBOL Miklos Szigetvari
- SV: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPRISE COBOL Thomas Berg
- Re: SV: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPRISE COBOL Miklos Szigetvari
- Re: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPRISE COBOL Sam Siegel
- CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPRISE COBOL Gordon G. Hodson
- Re: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPRISE COBOL Angel Luis DomÃnguez
- Re: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPRISE COBOL Miklos Szigetvari
- Re: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPRISE COBOL Angel Luis DomÃnguez
- Re: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPRISE COBOL Binyamin Dissen
- Re: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPRISE COBOL Angel Luis DomÃnguez
- ASM vs HLL (Was: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPRISE COBO... Edward Jaffe
- Re: ASM vs HLL (Was: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPR... Mike Shaw
- Re: ASM vs HLL (Was: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPR... Sam Siegel
- Re: ASM vs HLL (Was: CPU: ASSM vs ENTERPR... McKown, John
- Re: ASM vs HLL (Was: CPU: ASSM vs ENT... Sam Siegel
