Peter Relson's point was that, in general, one asynchronous exit may interrupt 
another.  This is certainly correct, even platitudinous; his post was made 
necessary by the use of too general language in earlier ones.
 
That VTAM elects to permit such interruptions only in one special case is also 
clear.  There is thus little scope here for a donnybrook about nothing.  

John Gilmore Ashland, MA 01721-1817 USA


                                          

Reply via email to