On 6/7/2011 9:57 AM, John Ehrman wrote:
Peter Farley noted:
<long_quote>
I just noticed a conflict between our version of HLASM (z/OS V1.10, HLASM
R1.6 PTF UK59311) and the z/Arch PoOP. When I run ASMA90 with the option
to print the UNIFIED or ZSERIES-5 level instruction tables, the instruction
mnemonics for the 64-bit version of the "load on condition" instructions is
different from the eighth edition PoOP manual. HLASM prints this for the
64-bit version:
LGOC RSY EBE2 R1,D2(B2)<,M3> LGOCE RSY EBE2 R1,D2(B2)<,M3>
LGOCH RSY EBE2 R1,D2(B2)<,M3> LGOCL RSY EBE2 R1,D2(B2)<,M3>
LGOCNE RSY EBE2 R1,D2(B2)<,M3> LGOCNH RSY EBE2 R1,D2(B2)<,M3>
LGOCNL RSY EBE2 R1,D2(B2)<,M3>
But the z/Arch PoOP says that the mnemonic is LOGC (page 7-228).
There is also a difference in HLASM's "store on condition" mnemonic vs. the
PoOP, STGOC vs STOCG (p. 7-309 in the PoOP).
Which one is correct?
</long_quote>
(1) The PoP is correct.
(2) Your copy of HLASM isn't: apply the August, 2010 PTF for APAR PK87960.
I've been mulling this over and looking at the PoO. I think the OP is
wrong. He writes: "the z/Arch PoOP says that the mnemonic is LOGC" but
in point of fact, the PoO says "LOCG" not "LOGC". Which is good for
me because that's what I have in my course. But I spent a lot of time
double-checking things.
The "STOCG" is correct.
Damn, there's so many instructions now. Ah well, good to keep
expanding the repertoire, eh?
--
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
The Trainer's Friend, Inc.
303-393-8716
http://www.trainersfriend.com
* To get a good Return on your Investment, first make an investment!
+ Training your people is an excellent investment
* Try our new tool for calculating your Return On Investment
for training dollars at
http://www.trainersfriend.com/ROI/roi.html
