> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:12 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: HLASM vs PoOP for 64-bit "load on condition" > instructions? <Snipped> > I've been mulling this over and looking at the PoO. I think the OP is > wrong. He writes: "the z/Arch PoOP says that the mnemonic is LOGC" but > in point of fact, the PoO says "LOCG" not "LOGC". Which is good for > me because that's what I have in my course. But I spent a lot of time > double-checking things.
I stand corrected. Slip of the fingers and failure to proofread before hitting "send". > The "STOCG" is correct. > > Damn, there's so many instructions now. Ah well, good to keep > expanding the repertoire, eh? Sometimes seems like *too* many, but yes, it keeps the job "interesting"! Peter -- This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
