At 8/29/2011 05:14 PM, Tom Marchant wrote:
Dave Cole wrote:
The suggestion that changes like this would shorten the POO by "at
least 25%" is absurd.
Of course it's absurd. I was exaggerating to make a point. But I do
think the size reduction would be more than the equally "absurd" "few
pages". But of course neither you nor I have taken actual
measurements, and so the both of us are just speculating.
In any case, I also think that the size issue is nonsense at best.
The weight of a large PDF is just as much equal to zero as is a small
PDF, while the searchability remains about the same.
My real concern remains the arduousness of reading the PoOP and the
hit against clarity that results.
But of course YMMV. In fact YMDV.
Regardless, it's all still a lot of fun for me!
Dave Cole REPLY TO: [email protected]
ColeSoft Marketing WEB PAGE: http://www.colesoft.com
736 Fox Hollow Road VOICE: 540-456-8536
Afton, VA 22920 FAX: 540-456-6658
