On Feb 24, 2012, at 08:01, Edward Jaffe wrote: > On 2/24/2012 5:43 AM, John Gilmore wrote: >> There had been a tacit assumption that notionally respectable ISVs do >> not do such things. That assumption has been undermined, and even >> responsible ISVs will now have to spend time and energy reassuring >> their customers that they are not guilty too. >> >> They are all now in the position of a locksmith suspected of burglary. > > I had a similar thought, so yesterday I reviewed our integrity statement... > Does the unnamed vendor have a similar integrity statement which is being ignored?
-- gil
