On 2012-05-16 13:10, Ray Mansell wrote:
Of course, if the assembler were to support the L' construct for literals, this would not be a problem.
At least during Pass 2. Lookahead is confusing. -- gil
On 2012-05-16 13:10, Ray Mansell wrote:
Of course, if the assembler were to support the L' construct for literals, this would not be a problem.
At least during Pass 2. Lookahead is confusing. -- gil