<grin> OK, you got me. I didn't mean the "prompt". I should have, perhaps, said the BASH command line interface and how it works, versus the TSO command line interface. In particular, likely due to the difference between the 3270 "block mode" interface used by TSO and the "character mode" interface mode used by BASH, I can type in the first few characters of a command, the press the TAB key. Bash will complete the command, if unique, or show the possible commands that start with the typed in characters. With TSO, I must remember the entire command. The same applies to file (data set) names. In addition, I can easily connect the output of one command to the input of another using "pipes". With Bash, I can also use "process subsitition" so that the output from a subcommand is used as if it were being read from a file in the outer command. And vice versa, I can use the a "file output" from the command as an input file to a subcommand. Yes, I do this sort of thing. Example. I wa! nt to " post process" the data coming from some program in 3 other programs. With TSO, run program 1 and output to a file. Then process that file as input to post process 1, then 2, then 3. Lots of I/O going on. In bash: generate | tee >(pgm1) >(pgm2) | pgm3 and no temporary files left around.
But, apologies to all, I'm really getting off-topic. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * [email protected] * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Shaw > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 3:57 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Messages - Was MVC with 2nd operand length > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:29 PM, McKown, John > <[email protected] > > wrote: > > > <...snip...>IMO. I.e. a BASH UNIX prompt beats the crap out > of line mode > > TSO.<...snip...> > > > > Jeepers John, I gotta disagree with you on that one. How is > '#' as a prompt > any better than 'READY'? As far as messages, there is no way > IMHO that a > non-numbered set of UNIX or LINUX messages is superior to ANY > numbered IBM > messages for ease of understanding. Google lets you look up those > unnumbered messages on the Internet and try to find some meaning, but > without Google non-numbered messages are an abomination. My > biggest pet > peeve is the explanation that certain unnumbered messages are 'self > explanatory'. What a crock... > > IBM was very smart to assign messages alphanumeric prefixes > and to collect > them in reference manuals for users to read and understand. > > Mike Shaw > MVS/QuickRef Support Group > Chicago-Soft, Ltd. > >
