On Jul 1, 2012, at 11:35, Jonathan Scott wrote: > Ref: Your note of Sun, 1 Jul 2012 15:44:53 +0200 > > HLASM does not allow literals unless the relevant instruction > operand in the opcode table is marked to say that a literal is > allowed. > Why? An address expression should be an address expression. Why should some be treated specially? I understand the restriction against modifying storage in the literal pool, but instructions that modify storage are already so marked in order to support RENT warnings.
-- gil
