My mistake it was assembling using IEV90 n ASMA90. There was one thread in a listserv where a ichrdsnt source was assembled using iev90 but the back up racf db failed to be in active status, but the same ichrdsnt source was assembled using asma90 and it was a success. So it made me more curious to know the difference. RTFM now but anyways is IEV90 supported ?
On Aug 14, 2012 6:50 PM, "Lizette Koehler" <[email protected]> wrote: > Jake, if you start doing some basic research, it will help you be more > efficient. You have not asked, what I think, is the right question. Your > question does not clearly ask a question that can be answered. It is very > unclear what you are asking. > > > Read the IBM Manuals, search the internet for information. > > These are the assemblers for IBM. What kind of difference are you looking > for? Also, have you checked to see which one is more current or supported? > Which one used to assemble your code? What program do you see when you run > your assembly? > > Look up when each one was released for use. > > Then if you have questions - you can ask better ones. > > And lastly - this is NOT a compiler - it is the assembler. I know some > will > get very detailed on this part. But you Compile 3rd 4th and beyond > generation code (COBOL, PL/I, JAVA). You use the Assembler (IEV90, ASMA90, > IFOX00) for the Assembler language. > > Lizette > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List > [mailto:[email protected]] > > On Behalf Of Jake anderson > > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 12:43 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Difference between ASMA90 and IEV90 > > > > Dear List, > > > > Could someone please enlighten me the difference between using IEV90 and > > ASMA90 during compilation ? > > > > Jake >
