I don't think IBM is the guilty party this time. Mr Butz is the first person in my experience who has used 'PC' as an acronym for the private code that precedes explicit RSECT, CSECT, or START statements.
I doubt, however, that this use of it can be stuffed back into the box. --jg On 8/25/12, Shane G <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25th, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Edward Jaffe wrote: > >> On 8/23/2012 3:40 PM, John Gilmore wrote: >> > PC is now an overloaded term, one that needs to be used carefully. >> >> I'll say! I only read this thread because I thought it was talking about >> some anomalous entry into a PC routine! > > And me ... > But fancy IBM overloading acronyms like that - say it ain't so. > > Shane ... >
