Paul Gilmartin noted: >Isn't there lately a construct that explicitly invokes a macro rather than an opcode? There should be.
There is indeed! Suffix ':MAC' or ':ASM' as appropriate, as in 'MSG:MAC' and 'MSG:ASM'. John Ehrman
Paul Gilmartin noted: >Isn't there lately a construct that explicitly invokes a macro rather than an opcode? There should be.
There is indeed! Suffix ':MAC' or ':ASM' as appropriate, as in 'MSG:MAC' and 'MSG:ASM'. John Ehrman