On 3/20/2013 12:48 PM, John Ehrman wrote:
Interesting suggestion; I'll add it to the "Wish List". You're right that similar ideas have been suggested in the past, but not in this specific form.
May I suggest a modification. I've passed positional parameters, but rarely have a need for keywords. It would be helpful to have a choice of positional, keyword, and both. And the keyword option could be further complicated by passing either all keywords defined on the prototype (with merged values), or only the ones supplied on the invocation. Gerhard Postpischil Bradford, Vermont
