Mayhap RTFM rather than WTFM? Or was that a sly comment directed at those who WTFM?
Bob Netzlof a/k/a Swwet Old Bob On 4/4/13, John McKown <[email protected]> wrote: > Similar to my way: > > runs=false > do until runs > compiles=false > do until compiles > edit source > compile > if (! compiles) && confused then WTFM > end > runs=run program > end > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Scott Ford <[email protected]> wrote: > >> John, >> >> Agreed, my first venture into AR and DSPSERV, so I am learning , no >> excuses, I should have looked at the WTO ... >> >> Scott ford >> www.identityforge.com >> >> Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll >> understand. - Chinese Proverb >> >> >> On Apr 4, 2013, at 8:12 AM, John McKown <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > And, IIRC, many such functions have a LINKAGE= parm which may allow use >> > where an SVC is not allowed. Such as LINKAGE=BRANCH for WTO (though >> > this >> > has rather strong requirements not met by most applications) . I rather >> > like using LINKAGE=SYSTEM when available. Of course, one must review >> > the >> > doc to see what is available and the restrictions for each LINKAGE= >> method. >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >>> I think you need to issue a SAC 0 to switch out of >> >>> AR mode before you use any SVCs. >> >> >> >> Not "any", but "many". WTO is one of the many. >> >> >> >> Peter Relson >> >> z/OS Core Technology Design >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an >> > actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you? >> > >> > Maranatha! <>< >> > John McKown >> > > > > -- > This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. If this had been an > actual emergency, do you really think we'd stick around to tell you? > > Maranatha! <>< > John McKown > -- Bob Netzlof a/k/a Sweet Old Bob
