So, to respond to the one comment, it was ok for the Science guys to want mixed case things because that was what they were used to. Ok, I can buy that. Same rationale can be applied to the C programmers. Now, let's be fair, using the very same reasoning, I can then justify MY perception that mixed case shouldn't be used on the mainframe, because I am used to it. Now, if you say they can justify their actions out of their preferrences and I can NOT do the same thing, then you surely can see how that is not fair for everyone, right? -------------------------------------------- On Mon, 2/24/14, Automatic digest processor <[email protected]> wrote:
Subject: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 23 Feb 2014 to 24 Feb 2014 (#2014-32) To: "Recipients of ASSEMBLER-LIST digests" <[email protected]> Date: Monday, February 24, 2014, 11:01 PM ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 23 Feb 2014 to 24 Feb 2014 (#2014-32) LISTSERV at the University of Georgia ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 23 Feb 2014 to 24 Feb 2014 (#2014-32) Table of contents: CamelCase Field Names (Was: Re: HLASM continuation...) (5) ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (10) camelCase et al CamelCase Field Names (Was: Re: HLASM continuation...) Re: CamelCase Field Names (Was: Re: HLASM continuation...) (02/24) From: Peter Relson <[email protected]> Re: CamelCase Field Names (Was: Re: HLASM continuation...) (02/24) From: Ray Mullins <[email protected]> Re: CamelCase Field Names (Was: Re: HLASM continuation...) (02/24) From: Ed Jaffe <[email protected]> Re: CamelCase Field Names (Was: Re: HLASM continuation...) (02/24) From: Chuck Arney <[email protected]> Re: CamelCase Field Names (Was: Re: HLASM continuation...) (02/24) From: Phil Smith III <[email protected]> ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: John Walker <[email protected]> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: Gord Tomlin <[email protected]> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: zMan <[email protected]> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: John McKown <[email protected]> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: Tom Thackrey <[email protected]> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: John Gilmore <[email protected]> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: Kirk Talman <[email protected]> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: Kirk Talman <[email protected]> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> Re: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 20 Feb 2014 to 21 Feb 2014 (#2014-29) (02/24) From: Ed Jaffe <[email protected]> camelCase et al camelCase et al (02/24) From: Kirk Talman <[email protected]> Browse the ASSEMBLER-LIST online archives.
