Binyamin Dissen wrote - Much easier using PT
Can you provide an example. Paul ---------- Original Message ---------- From: Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: WAVV2010 Presentation Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 17:52:36 +0300 Much easier using PT On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 12:48:34 GMT "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: :>I discovered a presentation from 2010 :>WAVV 2010 :>KEY15 vs KEY0 :>Author unknown :> :>This presentation provided some source code which I found intresting. :> MODESET KEY=ZERO Switch To Key 0 00009000 :> :> MODESET MODE=SUP Switch To Supervisor State 00010000 :> :> STCTL R3,R3,WORK Control Register 3 00020000 :> :> OC WORK(2),=X'0003' Allow Key E and F 00030001 :> :> LCTL R3,R3,WORK Control Register 3 00040100 :> :> MODESET KEY=NZERO Return To User Key 00040202 :> :> MODESET MODE=PROB Return to Problem State 00040300 :> :> ORG *-32 00040400 :> :> DC X'00000008' 00040500 :> :> ORG 00040600 :> :>* 00040700 :> :> :>My understanding is that this snipet of code allows the caller to add PSW Key E and F to there PSWKey list. :>. :>Now I have no actual need for code like this but I did find it interesting. :>. :>Does anyone use this technique ? :>. :>Does anyone have a routine like this that is coded differently ? :>. :>Any code sharing would be appreciated . :>Just curious :>. :>Paul D'Angelo :> :> -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies.
