Some organizations restrict the use of IPCS to systems programmers, so IEATDUMP would not help me.
I wonder, should I raise this over on IBM-MAIN as well to catch the attention of Peter Relson or John Eells? Peter -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Ngan Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 2:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SNAP macro for storage above the 2G bar? Hmmm, it looks like IEATDUMP's LIST= / LISTAD= parameters only support fullword address values. However, above the bar storage is included in the dump dataset. Robert Ngan CSC Financial Services Group IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> wrote on 2014/08/14 12:30:46: > From: "Farley, Peter x23353" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 2014/08/14 12:31 > Subject: SNAP macro for storage above the 2G bar? > Sent by: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> > > I have been reading up on the SNAP macro for some debugging efforts > I need to accomplish, but it seems to me from RTFM that SNAP only > supports 24- and 31-bit addresses for the STORAGE, LIST and STRHDR operands. > > Assembling a SNAP macro with "SYSSTATE ARCHLVL=2,AMODE64=YES" does > not modify the size of the address fields in the SNAP parameter > list, which leads me to believe that 64-bit addresses are just not supported. > > Am I correct in my deduction? If so, how would I go about getting > the equivalent of a SNAP for storage above the 2G bar? > > Peter This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
