On 2014-10-03 10:42, Ed Jaffe wrote: > On 10/3/2014 8:36 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >> Would the programmer be well-advised to use Binder ORDER commands lest >> SMP/E service reorder CSECTs and move a target out of relative addressing >> range? > > Unnecessary. LARL and its ilk have an addressing range considerably wider > than the largest supported program object. > Oops! I had thought program objects could be up to 16M; relative addressing limited to +-1M. Which is wrong? (Both?)
What about RMODE(SPLIT)? That could put CSECTs far apart. RMODE(64) even farther. -- gil
