I should be happy to see it work between AMODE(31) and AMODE(64), but IBM appears to have judged that implementing it wouldn't be worth the trouble. Too few people would make use of it.
I am not entirely sure what "making it work [only] between AMODE(24) and AMODE(64)" would mean; but, as EJ has said, it doesn't. John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
