On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Gary Weinhold <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't know just when LE decides it has to build an enclave, but if your
> routine could be invoked by a non-LE routine (a transaction written in
> assembler, for example), perhaps it would cause significant overhead.  If
> that's impossible, then no worries.  Even it were possible, I don't know
> how that overhead compares to storage obtain/release.


​A point to remember. But, in this case, the routine is going to be
(supposedly) running as the main program in a started task. One possible
problem _might_ be that the routine must run in AR mode to access a data
space. So I'll likely need to read up on LE and AR mode. I'd almost be that
LE was _not_ designed with AR mode routines in mind. So I'll likely need to
be switching back and forth if I do much with LE. Hum, perhaps my love of
using C run-time subroutines needs​ be rethought. Or maybe I could use the
Metal C subroutines and so bypass LE. <sigh> Decisions! Decisions! Maybe
I'll just go back to playing "Midnight Castle". It's easier.

-- 
​
While a transcendent vocabulary is laudable, one must be eternally careful
so that the calculated objective of communication does not become ensconced
in obscurity.  In other words, eschew obfuscation.

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

Reply via email to