We've been receiving PMRs for HLASM due to users using an SMP/E USERMOD create an alias of IEV90 against HLASM's ASMA90. For historical reasons, users still have JCL procedures and EXECs referring to IEV90 rather than the newer ASMA90. Invariably problems arise due to the USERMOD process when maintenance is applied. We have modified our sample to help reduce issues, but we still receive PMRs. Because this appears to be source of continued problems we are considering modifying our SMP/E JCLIN to create a permanent alias of IEV90 for ASMA90 on z/OS. However, before we progress with this, we'd like to understand if this could cause problems for anyone. If anyone has any comments or concerns with this proposal, we'd be interested to hear - either on the forum or an email to me. Jeremy Stone [email protected] HLASM Development and Support
