ORG , could produce other than the desired result. Charles
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of somitcw Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 12:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: ORG question On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:14:38 -0400, Charles Mills <[email protected]> posted: > ORG *+3, DS XL3 or DS 3X seem good to me, FWIW. I don't perceive >future ORG problems, but I could be missing something. > Charles Thanks. DS would cause a strange issue to me. You don't want to know. If no one can recommend "ORG ," over "ORG *+3" I'll assume that "ORG *+3" is the best. For many decades, I've been using "ORG ," so it may be time for me to change?
